Supporting Recently Traumatized Youth in a Crisis of Dissociation and Self-Harm

Case Background

Samantha, a 15-year-old African American young woman, was referred for psychotherapy by the hospital where she was taken after she was gang-raped while passed out at a party after drinking more than she ever had. This is Samantha’s first ever outpatient psychotherapy session, and she finds herself experiencing disorienting and, at times, overwhelming waves of depression and hopelessness as well as dissociative fugue states. Trying to calm herself, Samantha also finds herself involuntarily scratching at her arm and sucking her thumb, both of which give her a comforting sense of emotional and physical numbness.

Samantha’s friends describe her as a beautiful, kind, and honest person with a great sense of humor, an A student, and a star athlete. Samantha attends an exclusive private high school on scholarship; there, she is one of very few students of color. Her dream is to get a scholarship to an Ivy League university. When not studying or on the lacrosse field, she volunteers to help children and families in need in the community and for human rights causes. Older boys have frequently asked Samantha out, but she has never agreed because her parents are strict about dating and don’t want her to get entangled in a romantic relationship and lose her focus on college.  

Samantha’s family lives in urban public housing, where drug abuse and community violence are common occurrences. When she was 10 years old, Samantha witnessed her older brother, Andre, get shot and killed. He was walking her home from school, and they were caught in the crossfire of a gang fight. At the time, she didn’t understand what had happened when he suddenly fell down and blood was all over the sidewalk around him. She tried to get him to wake up and get up, but he wouldn’t open his eyes, move, or speak. She remembers neighbors taking her home and her mother screaming and sobbing when told that Andre had been shot. Samantha recalls that her mother “never was the same” after that; She wouldn’t go out except to go to work and return home.

Samantha frequently found her mother seemingly in another world, sobbing and saying, “My boy, my boy!” After the shooting, Samantha’s father also started drinking alcohol to the point of intoxication several times a week. Samantha has learned to stay away from him when he is drinking because he changes from being a loving and kind man to an angry and violent person she doesn’t recognize.

Samantha’s parents kept their jobs; They worked long hours and encouraged her to get scholarships and do well in school and sports. Samantha feels very grateful but also guilty that her parents are stressed and working hard while she seems to be enjoying school and sports in a sheltered school setting. Girls in her neighborhood, though, call her an “Oreo” (because she is Black, but they see her as trying to act like a White girl) and have stopped being friends with Samantha.

At school, girls pick on the way she speaks, saying she sounds like a “ghetto girl,” and that she only got into the school because of charity or government handouts. She has a solid group of male friends but sometimes feels like she doesn’t really fit in with the other girls at school. Girls are also jealous of her because of the attention she gets from boys, which has made making girlfriends even more difficult. She has one close female friend, Lily, who is also on the lacrosse team.

At the end of Samantha’s junior year, after she had aced a very difficult AP (Advanced Placement) chemistry exam, Lily convinced her to go to a senior summer kickoff party. A graduating senior, Jack, who had been asking Samantha out since she was a freshman, was hosting the party and wanted both girls to come. After prodding from Lily, Samantha decided to “let loose” for one night and attend the party. Samantha told her parents that she was sleeping over at Lily’s. Jack made a big deal of Samantha’s being at the party and offered to “grab drinks.” Although he was enthusiastic, Jack had always been friendly and had never been aggressive in his pursuit of Samantha. Samantha had only experimented with alcohol, but she wanted the full party experience, so she decided to “go for it.”

Samantha began by slowly sipping on a drink, but then got pulled into a drinking game with Jack and his guy friends. She quickly became intoxicated. Jack asked her if she wanted to go somewhere quiet to talk, and Samantha agreed. Jack helped her walk precariously to his bedroom, and the moment she sat on his bed, Samantha passed out. Realizing that she needed to be taken care of, Jack went to find Lily. This took quite a while with the raucous party spilling over into all parts of the house.

When Jack and Lily returned, they saw four very intoxicated guys nervously coming up the hallway from the direction of Jack’s room. When Jack and Lily entered the room and turned on the lights, they saw Samantha sprawled out and mostly undressed on Jack’s bed, still unconscious. Lily called an ambulance and Samantha’s parents.

Samantha woke up in a hospital room with Lily, Jack, her parents, and a nurse. “What happened?” she mumbled. “The last thing I remember was being with you, Jack. Something’s wrong. I feel all numb but like my body’s been run over by a truck. Did we get into an accident?” The next several weeks were a nightmare for Samantha, and for her parents and friends. She felt depressed and scared because she could tell she had been assaulted, but she had no memory of it.

When she met with a sexual assault counselor working with the police and learned that one of the boys had confessed and that she might have to go to court if criminal charges were pressed, she felt terrified and like the whole world would know she was “dirty.” The sexual assault counselor got her an appointment with a female therapist who worked with girls and women who have been sexually assaulted. Samantha delayed starting psychotherapy for several weeks by canceling several sessions. Her parents finally insisted that she talk with the therapist and drove her to this, her first, psycho-therapy session.

Session Transcript, Annotations, and Commentary

After the annotated session transcript, I present a summary of Samantha’s observations and reflections on her experience in the session. Following this summary is commentary highlighting key themes and take-home points for handling this or similar crises, and questions for reader self-reflection.

THERAPIST: So, Samantha, tell me a little bit about you.

SAMANTHA: (Stares at her lap) I’m in school.

THERAPIST: Mm-hmm.

SAMANTHA: (Still looks down but glances furtively at the therapist) And I’m into my senior year. I like to play volleyball.

Therapist’s Inner Reflections: Samantha seems very withdrawn and in a lot of pain and emotional turmoil. She looks haunted; there’s definite fear in her eyes, and she’s glazing over and just barely holding it together. Looks like she’s heading for an emergency and a breakdown. I want to help her reorient to the present, so I’ll engage her in focusing on who she was before the rape with an emphasis on her physical self so that she can become more aware of her body and slow down the flood of ruminations that she appears to be experiencing.

By orienting to the strengths and abilities she had—and still has—this can help her do an SOS [as discussed in Chapter 5, SOS refers to slowing down and sweeping her mind clear, orienting to a thought that helps her feel safe, and self-checking stress level and level of personal control] and begin to feel more personal control despite the intense distress she’s feeling. I’m not going to introduce the SOS formally to her because that would seem too didactic and intrusive, but I can help her do an SOS and begin to focus herself by showing an interest in her interests and strengths.  

THERAPIST: Excellent. I know that you know this—I met with your parents a little bit before you, so they told me that you have been a great athlete for a while. So, volleyball is now your favorite sport?

SAMANTHA: (Hunches over, looks at her feet, no longer glances at the therapist) Uh-huh.

THERAPIST: Excellent. Wonderful. Okay. And, um, I also know that things have been rough the past 3½ weeks . . . and that’s why you’re here today. So, I want you to know that—that we can work on this, that this is actually gonna be, um, a little bit hard at the beginning, but I know that you will—we will figure out ways that you can really overcome this terrible thing that had just happened to you. I’m sorry. So, because you’re a good athlete, I know that you work hard . . .

SAMANTHA: (Relaxes slightly) Mm-hmm.

Therapist’s Inner Reflections: I’m not going to ask her to tell me what’s triggering the distress for her because that probably seems obvious to her (even though it’s more complicated than she fully recognizes). By acknowledging the trauma in general terms, I’ve signaled to her that I do recognize what’s triggering her but that I’m not going to dredge up what’s happened or how she’s feeling because she’s probably trying very hard to not be aware of the shame and betrayal that I expect she’s feeling—and to not think about the rape, even though she probably can’t stop having intrusive memories, especially because she was not conscious while the rape happened. For the sake of Samantha’s sense of security in talking with me, which is very new and fragile — with this being our first session, the betrayal she’s experienced, and her damaged sense of self and efficacy—I’m going to emphasize her ability to accomplish difficult goals at this point.

THERAPIST: . . . and also your parents told me that you are a very good student, too.

SAMANTHA: (Looks up tentatively) Uh-huh.

THERAPIST: You have worked for—for everything that you have now. Right? And you really just have to finish your senior year the same way that you have, you know, have worked so hard your whole life to be where you are. So, your parents are telling me that they are concerned because you’re not going to school. Hmm. That has been really hard on you.

SAMANTHA: (Looks at the therapist, then down) I just don’t feel like going to school anymore.

THERAPIST: Mm-hmm. Yeah. So, tell me some of the reasons why you don’t want to go to school.

Therapist’s Inner Reflections: I’m sure there are many reasons that may seem obvious to Samantha, but I’m asking her to support this shift she’s just made from being passive and numb emotionally to being able to actively express her point of view. She’s engaging, even though the first signs are anger. Let’s see what more specific triggers she recognizes.

SAMANTHA: (Looks directly at the therapist, eyes blazing) I don’t wanna see certain people. (She sits back, strokes her ear reflexively with one hand, and sucks on the thumb of her other hand.)

Therapist’s Inner Reflections: The distress she’s feeling is intense. I see her doing several forms of reflexive physical self-soothing to tolerate the distress. As she does that automatically, she could put herself into a dissociative trance. I’ll support her intention of self-soothing and see if I can gently help her to do it consciously and to access other forms of self-regulation as well so that the self-soothing doesn’t lead to a dissociative shutdown.

Dissociation could lead to the healthy self-protective and self-assertive anger she’s understandably feeling to leak into her self-soothing in the form of unconscious or barely conscious self-harm. I’ll start by returning to the first part of the SOS: helping her focus on her breathing and being aware of her body.  

THERAPIST: Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Okay. It’s hard to, to see some of your friends or your acquaintances? And now I can see that it is really hard, Sam, to just talk about this. And I can also see that your body is telling you that probably right now you need to be soothed. So, one way of doing it, and I bet it’s helping you, is by touching your ear—yeah? And sucking your thumb. We can explore other ways that can also be helpful. Can I show you some other ways? (Samantha nods.)

THERAPIST: So, let’s try to focus on your breathing, Sam. Can you breathe for me deeply? Can you feel the air coming in from your nostrils? Can you do it maybe one time? Can we try another one? (Samantha looks down and begins rubbing and then scratching her arm.) This is too hard. This is painful. Is the scratching helping you? Hmm. Can we explore other ways, too? (Samantha stops scratching her arm and instead rubs it more slowly and gently. She begins to tap her feet vigorously.)

So, I can see that you’re moving your feet. Can you feel your feet on the floor, Sam? Yeah? Can you tell me if your feet are warm or cold? Yeah. Let’s try to keep on moving your feet. Keep on moving them. Yeah. Can you move your other foot? Yeah. Alright. Can we breathe a little bit more? Let’s do three times this time. Okay? One . . . two . . . three.

SAMANTHA: (Shifts from rubbing her arm to scratching with increasing intensity; begins to hyperventilate.)

Therapist’s Inner Reflections: Samantha’s escalating into emotional dysregulation and what looks like a dissociative state. Helping her to relax may be unintentionally leading her to lose track of her ability to self-regulate, I need to stay with the focus on body awareness but step up and gently but firmly guide her with very specific small steps to doing so without hurting herself.

I think she needs to see what I’m talking about, both to be able to cognitively process what I’m saying and to reorient herself to being present and not alone but supported by me. I’ll keep the focus on her being in control of herself so that she doesn’t experience me as taking control away from her in the way that those boys did by sexually assaulting her when she was unconscious.

THERAPIST: And, instead of scratching, can you touch your other hand and your arm like this? How does that feel? Can you feel your arm? Can you feel your wrist? Yeah? Keep breathing. You’re in a safe place, Sam. Nobody’s trying to hurt you here. Okay. I like this. Do you feel that your body likes it? When you try to soothe yourself like that, how does it feel?

THERAPIST: (Samantha gradually breathes more slowly and deeply with a more relaxed torso and legs.) Nice.

Therapist’s Inner Reflections: As Samantha calms down and comes back into the room, I can feel the tension draining out of my body as well. I’m primarily focused on Samantha, but I’m noticing that it helps me personally to self-regulate by doing these simple self-awareness actions along with Samantha. Now I can help Samantha not only feel calmer but also safer and protected. I’d like to give her a hug myself to comfort and reassure her, but I know I’m not her mother (even though I’m thinking about my daughters and wanting to hold them when they’re upset or hurt), and she needs to know that no one will intrude on her in this therapy. So even through it seems kind of silly, it makes sense to help Samantha to hug herself, and she’ll know that I am contributing to that hug without intruding on her personal space in a physical way that could feel like a replication of the rape (and her brother’s murder). 

THERAPIST: Nice? Alright. Have you ever given yourself hugs? No? Sometimes I give myself some hugs. Sometimes that helps me. Try it—maybe not here but later on. Okay? I’m wondering, you know, how we’re gonna find ways that soothing yourself is going to be part of your daily routine, and, at the same time, you can soothe yourself and only you will know that you’re soothing yourself. Alright? So, we did that sort of breathing a, a little bit of deep breathing, so you know that you’re breathing deeply because you want to focus on the here and now, putting your feet on the floor and making sure that you know that you’re feeling it, feeling your hands. Right? Feeling different parts of your body and focusing on, you know, where you are.

Therapist’s Inner Reflections: If I help Samantha connect these simple breathing and body awareness actions with her athletic skills, that can make this something she can do intentionally both to reduce the intensity of her hyperarousal and to tap into her self-confidence. And I will emphasize the core goal of keeping herself safe, which is what she feels she and her friend (as well as the boys who perpetrated the rape) failed to do. Then I can link the goal of being safe to her withdrawal, which is a problem and a symptom of depression because it keeps her trapped in survival mode but also is an adaptive attempt to protect herself.

THERAPIST: Okay? It’s almost like playing volleyball, you know? I bet that you’re so good at volleyball because you are actually practicing, and when you practice more and more, you get better and better, right? So, it’s the same thing here with our emotions. The more that we try to stay in the here and now, the more that you’re gonna feel a little bit safer. Okay? And, so, the more that you feel, you know, that you are in safe environments like—I bet that you’re spending a lot of time in your house right now. Is it—is your house a safe place for you? Does it feel safe? (Samantha nods.) Okay.

SAMANTHA: (Continues to visibly relax; makes tentative eye contact with the therapist) Yeah, it does.

THERAPIST: Okay. Are there any other places that are—make you feel safe? No? Only your house? Okay. Alright. So, tell me a little bit about what would going back to school look like. What do you think that you need in order to feel calm, in order to feel that you can soothe yourself utilizing healthy ways so you can go back?   

Therapist’s Inner Reflections: Samantha now is associating the main goal of safety with calmer body feelings that represent a main emotion (feeling “nice,” which seems to mean that she feels a sense of peacefulness emotionally) and a main thought (that she is not trapped in horrible distress but has active ways to enable herself to feel better). With safety as a main goal that can organize her complicated emotions and thoughts, we can begin to explore her options for achieving the goal of protecting herself (and the related goal of returning to school and resuming her life and progress toward future goals, such as success in school and sports).

SAMANTHA: I have my best friend.

THERAPIST: Mm-hmm. Your best friend. So, tell me, what is your best friend’s name?

SAMANTHA: Lily.

THERAPIST: How long have you known Lily?

SAMANTHA: Since high school started.

THERAPIST: Okay. Since freshman? Wonderful. So, you’ve known her for 3 years now?

SAMANTHA: Yeah.

THERAPIST: Okay. And you can trust Lily? Has she been contacting you? Yeah? So, has she been supporting you these past 3½ weeks? Yeah? How does she support you? What is she doing to help you?

SAMANTHA: (Smiles shyly) She’ll check up on me like every day or so.  

Therapist’s Inner Reflections: Samantha is such a resilient young woman! Without my bringing it up, she went right to what’s probably the single best way to begin restoring her sense of relational security, which had been shattered by her friend Jack’s neglect and the other boys’ betrayal and exploitation.

Samantha is a little fearful of trusting that her best friend Lily won’t also let her down or even reject her, but she can see that her friend is standing by her. The sense of being cared about and valued, and watched over in a helpful and nonintrusive way are clearly crucial for Samantha’s recovery. I’ll explore that as a potential path forward for her.

THERAPIST: Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Wow. So, is she actually contacting you quite often? Yeah. Alright. Have you been able to keep up with some of the work at school? No?

SAMANTHA: (Shifts back to a tense fetal-like position; withdraws eye contact) No.

THERAPIST: Alright. Okay. Is that something that you would like to do? Yeah. Okay. So, you’re a very brave young woman who has gone through a lot, and your body is very wise and knows how to calm and soothe you. So, I’m wondering if, for next week, maybe you can visit your friend Lily at her house before next week and see how that goes? Would that be something that you are willing to try? Is that something that you think that you can do?   

Therapist’s Inner Reflections: That was a mistake and a close call. I jumped ahead by implying that I was urging Samantha to go back to school. I got caught up in the relief that Samantha (and I as well) was feeling when focusing on the security that her friendship provides. I’m glad I caught that by noticing Samantha’s nonverbal signaling and stepped back to suggest a much more manageable first step of just going to the friend but not facing the much larger set of stressors and triggers that she’ll encounter when she returns to school. One step at a time. I’ll help Samantha build a behavioral chain of small steps that can help her reengage with her relationships and her particular areas of strength and success: schoolwork and athletics.

SAMANTHA: (Looks thoughtful, determined, and then makes eye contact) Yeah.

THERAPIST: Okay. Alright. And I’m also wondering if you can start talking with Lily about some of the things that you can start doing at home or maybe with her, some of the schoolwork, especially about the good subjects that you really like and enjoy? Is that something that you think that you might want to focus on this week?

SAMANTHA: (Continues uninterrupted eye contact) Yeah.

THERAPIST: Alright. And the last thing, Sam. I’m also wondering, since you are an athlete and you got this—right—I’m wondering if there is anything that you can do this week that can help you to maybe jog a little bit or walk fast or—or do something like that around outside—around your house, where you can . . .

SAMANTHA: (Nods and continues to make eye contact) Yeah.

THERAPIST: . . . do some exercise?

SAMANTHA: Mm-hmm.

THERAPIST: Is that something that you think that you can do? Yes?

SAMANTHA: Yeah. I can do that. Yeah.

THERAPIST: Alright. Well, I’m really looking forward to seeing you next week. Okay? Thank you.  

Samantha's Observation

In a post session interview, Samantha said that she had been feeling that she didn’t recognize herself anymore and that her parents didn’t look at her in the same way as before. She was ruminating constantly about the party, berating herself for being so stupid and wishing she had never trusted Jack and his “so-called friends.” She had secretly started cutting herself to make the pain and shaking stop and sucking her thumb to comfort herself. In the session, she initially felt physically tense because she didn’t want to have to answer more questions from another adult about the assault and about how she was feeling and coping now.

She was surprised and reassured when the therapist was very gentle and accepting, but then she felt that she let down her guard and started to space out: “I kind of went somewhere else.” She felt extremely embarrassed when she realized that she had begun to suck her thumb in the therapist’s presence, but she didn’t know how to make herself stop. She felt a strong urge to hurt herself when the therapist brought up the earlier experience of witnessing her brother being killed. Samantha described having felt a sense of confusion and shock related to witnessing her brother’s murder that she realized was very similar to how she had been feeling about being assaulted. That realization helped her to understand why she felt unable to stop thinking about the assault: “It was another time when I was powerless to stop something terrible from happening to someone I cared about, and no one else protected them or me, either.”

Samantha emphasized that she found the therapist’s guidance to be helpful in enabling her to be “more in my body” and more aware of the present moment and surroundings. She found being able to be more aware gave her a feeling that she wasn’t powerless, that she could “take back some control.” She also felt calmer and safer, which was very different than the brief feelings of relief that she’d gotten from sucking her thumb or cutting herself—and she also didn’t have to deal with feeling ashamed of herself and embarrassed, which had been making things much worse for her emotionally.

By the end of the session, Samantha was feeling a small amount of hope that, with the therapist’s help, she could talk about the assault and her brother’s murder and figure out how to not feel so terrible that she couldn’t stop thinking about those horrifying memories. She also had hopes of figuring out manageable steps she could take to work toward returning to school and “getting back to having a normal life.”  

Commentary

As the session unfolded, the therapist clearly was focused on three primary goals:

  • building an alliance and instilling hope by interacting with Samantha in a way that was nonjudgmental, accepting, nonintrusive, and responsive, and that facilitated a sense of relational security, resilience, active problem solving, and hope for solutions
  • assisting Samantha in regulating her emotions and becoming nonjudgmentally aware of the understandable emotional turmoil she was experiencing by identifying and adapting her intuitive ways of coping with memories and emotions, and supporting her by affirming, highlighting, and drawing on Samantha’s many personal strengths
  • assisting Samantha in setting and emotionally committing to an over-arching goal that reflected her current concerns and that enabled her to organize her complicated emotions and thoughts in a manner that provided her with a path forward to restore the parts of her life and the aspects of herself—as an outstanding student and athlete, and as a valued friend—that she had relied on as a source of inner security, pride, and hope for the future  
The therapist navigated a number of crucial and challenging choice points in working toward these three goals. As the therapist’s inner reflections indicated, a first challenge was to help Samantha to remain sufficiently oriented to be able to self-regulate and benefit from the support and guidance the therapist could provide. Without explicitly teaching the first FREEDOM (focusing, recognizing triggers, emotion awareness, evaluating thoughts, defining goals and options, making a contribution; see the Introduction) step, the SOS for focusing, the therapist helped Samantha begin to be aware of her body and present circumstances for the very beginning of the session (the first “S” in SOS).

She also helped Samantha to orient (the “O” in SOS) by highlighting her ability and interest in sports. And she helped Samantha track not only the intensity of distress she was feeling (using body feelings rather than verbalized emotions as the guide) but also her sense of personal control (again using breathing and tactile self-awareness as a practical way to feel in control).

A common challenge faced when working with clients in or on the verge of crisis is establishing rapport and trust while determining how— and when—to best help the client disclose the memories and emotions that are causing severe distress. In the post session interview, the therapist confirmed that she was aware of recent traumatic events that had occurred for Samantha but did not ask Samantha to talk about those events. This signaled to Samantha that she could trust the therapist not to be intrusive, which was crucial in light of the traumatic violation Samantha had experienced and the many questions that she and others were asking her about what happened.

By alluding to the events, the therapist also was communicating indirectly to Samantha that it is important to consciously recognize the triggers that remind her of the traumatic events. In addition to simply being in therapy (which almost inevitably brings up memories), the therapist identified other key triggers, including going to school and Samantha’s experiencing distress in her body. Rather than inquiring about the specific triggering stimuli and circumstances, the therapist immediately focused on helping Samantha to respond to triggered distress with body awareness and breathing.

Doing so communicated to Samantha that conscious recognition of triggers does not mean that there is any pressure to dwell on or even talk about the traumas, the triggers, or both that elicit trauma-related memories. In this way, the therapist helped Samantha to recognize—rather than simply react to—current triggers for distress as well as the trauma-related memories. Samantha’s reaction of increased d

Psychotherapy with Dissociative Identity Disorder

“I call them the persons of my mind, my “pers,” Robin said, in reference to the split personalities she experiences due to trauma. “I talk out loud to them and I find it therapeutic, but I try to be careful because I know it can bother my roommate, and other people,” she said.

Like what you are reading? For more stimulating stories, thought-provoking articles and new video announcements, sign up for our monthly newsletter.

The Long-term Consequences of Trauma

Robin had suffered severe trauma years earlier, and subsequently was diagnosed with Dissociative Identity Disorder, with associated psychotic symptoms (voice-hearing and delusions).

She currently resides in a nursing home, where she receives care and treatment for a painful chronic medical condition that she keenly understands may be a terminal one. She also receives psychiatric medications, and she meets with me for psychotherapy.

Robin is intelligent and articulate, and able to think in rational and logical ways. The psychotic and dissociative features have a common origin in her traumatic experiences. Addressing split personality issues is only a part of the scope of our therapy conversations, yet will be the focus of this blog.

Robin had experienced much psychiatric care over the years, and she was fluent with professional terminology. I did not begin to directly address the split personalities, or pers as she calls them, until a trusting therapeutic rapport had been well established, and only after she had initiated comments that were directly including the pers in our conversation. We then began to discuss the therapeutic goal of reintegration of the personality fragments into the self, and to include the pers in conversations.

Robin would tell me how the pers were listening to and reacting to comments I was making, and she would convey questions they raised. “They like the way you talk to me, and to them,” Robin said.

Robin would sometimes mentally gather the pers so they might participate in our sessions. I would speak in a teaching way about the trauma she previously experienced, about the fragmenting impacts of trauma, and about ways that dissociative features could have a protective effect — at least at the time of the trauma. I would explain that the so-called split personalities were actually all parts of Robin, and that one purpose of therapy was to help them all come together again as one person.

“There is only one Robin,” I said. “There are no other persons or personalities inside of you that are not Robin. Parts of you, Robin, might be experienced as if being separate — but only because of the psychologically explosive impact of trauma. The task of healing is a gathering up of the parts into the whole — of learning to recognize and identify with those thoughts and feelings and memories that have seemed peculiarly different, due to shattering troubles.

Some pers would argue or complain to or about Robin because, “they feel frustrated being stuck in this nursing home, and they want to be out in the world doing things. They get mad at me because I can’t easily move or walk.

“I can feel the pers moving in my body, and sometimes others come in and enter the pers, and I can feel them in my body, and I don’t really know who they are or what they want,” Robin remarked.

We would talk about the pers as aspects of Robin’s own feelings — that she feels frustrated being ill, and restricted to the nursing home, for example. We spoke of how the “others” were Robin’s as-yet unfamiliar, or unconscious, thoughts and feelings, and that her bodily sensations were ordinary visceral elements of emotions (but feelings numbed by suffering for Robin or pushed away from awareness to the point of seeming to be other than self).

When her subjective experiences were considered as unfamiliar elements of her own thoughts and feelings, Robin could glean new understandings about the complexity of her reactions.

When providing psychotherapy to someone with dissociative identity disorder — like Robin — I have found it important to keep in the front of my mind, and for the client, that this is one person; one unfortunate person, yet one quite resilient and remarkable person. Robin suffered great misfortune, yet she has been quite resourceful in her coping and her capacity for growth. Her well-being has been served by our careful, gentle, and sustained reconsideration of her internal experiences, with the aim of “bringing it all back home,” as Bob Dylan said, or returning the many parts into the one whole.  

Suicidal Debates with Clients in Psychotherapy

When I started working as a therapist, the prospect of a client dying from suicide terrified me. I worried I would miss the warning signs, and that my negligence would have deadly consequences. There was a dangerous side of therapy, and I worried that eventually, there would be no avoiding it.

I still remain cautious, but I’m no longer terrified. I’m cautious because tragic events in my own practice have confirmed that the dangers in therapy are quite real. Yet I’m no longer terrified because I’ve learned how to think about suicide and depression more carefully. I’ve learned there are deaths that I won’t have the ability to prevent, but there’s still much I can do to help. I still believe that in most cases, therapy can interrupt clients as they shuffle down the path of despair, and it can turn them back towards the community of the living.  

Separating Depression from Sadness

My early concern around suicide came from the difficulty of thinking clearly about depression. The word “depressed” means different things across different contexts. It’s like the word “drugs.” Am I using drugs each time I go through a Starbucks drive-thru? Caffeine is a drug, so by one definition, I’m a daily drug user. A real bad boy. Leather jacket. Fingerless gloves. However, there’s an obvious difference between hot bean water and heroine, even though the word “drugs” can be used to accurately describe them both. When I think of paraphernalia, 20-oz cups and green stirring sticks don’t usually come to mind.

I think the word “depression” is also overly broad in a similar way. Before I was a therapist, I would use the word “depressing” to describe a sad mood, events in the news, or microwaving hotdogs for dinner. I no longer use the word depression in this way. Instead, I try to limit myself to when I’m describing a major depressive disorder. The reason I work to limit my use of the word is because depression, in its clinical form, increases the risk of suicide dramatically, and so I think it’s important to avoid the blurring of language. In matters of life and death, clarity is vital. Forcing myself into this distinction also helped me learn about five significant differences between depression and sadness in my therapy. My clients taught me their five depressing truths about depression.

Five Depressing Truths

When I first met clients who had traveled to the outer frontier of depressed states, I noticed that while despair could be their primary mood state, this wasn’t always the case. For some, it was an absence of feeling that they experienced. The client didn’t always tell me “I’m extremely sad,” but instead they sometimes they said, “I feel nothing — and I don’t know where I went.” Depression could present with a numbness, or more precisely, my clients were experiencing the first of their five truths; self-missingness. Their inner selves had left them behind, and what remained was an empty waiting room. This was one of the first differences that I noticed between depression and sadness.  

I also noticed that depression could create sleeping problems, difficulty with focusing, low energy, and a guilt that bent towards exaggeration. This guilt condemned my clients to wrongdoings they hadn’t committed. They felt guilty about being depressed, and when they had moments of reprieve, they felt guilty about that, too. My client’s minds would become kangaroo courts, and they would find themselves guilty on every trumped-up charge they could conjure. But in its most exaggerated form, this guilt could convince my clients they were harming others by committing the crime of simply being alive. More on this a little later. But this guilt, along with the collection of other symptoms, taught me another distinction between depression and sadness. While sadness is the description of a single mood state, depression includes a constellation of interconnected symptoms. In other words — and here is the second truth for my depressed clients — sadness is singular, but depression is plural.  

The absence of identifiable causes was a third truth, or dynamic, that my clients taught me. While stressors could certainly inaugurate depressive episodes, depressive episodes didn’t need external events to bring them about. Depression simply didn’t care about how well my clients were doing. Depression would invite itself into their life without notice, track mud into their house, and climb into their bed with its shoes on. In fact, many of my clients would tell me that they were on vacation when they first noticed that something wasn’t right. From their wicker chair, they watched the sun flicker on the water, listened to the waves — and felt absolutely devastated. It was the very contrast of the internal and external landscapes that brought them to realize that something was significantly wrong. These clients showed me this third truth about depression: it can darken the internal world, without identifiable darkness in the external one.

A fourth difference between sadness and depression that I learned from my clients was that sadness is an expression of the authentic personality, but depression is a departure from it. When depression eventually loosened its grip, my clients often expressed how unrecognizable their former self appeared to them. Depression seemed to operate like a spell. It would capture their emotional state and pull them into a shadowed place, and when this spell would loosen its hold, a return to their authentic personality would occur.

The final difference my clients taught me, and I think it’s the most important, is that depression can be quite dangerous, but sadness is not necessarily so. Far from being dangerous, I think sadness is a vital feeling. Sadness is how my clients felt when something important had been lost. Whether they lost a relationship, a home, or a career — sadness was the pain of absence. And as much as it hurt for my clients to feel it, this pain of absence was deeply important. It was important because when saddened, what mattered most to my clients was revealed. The pain of absence taught them what needed to be present in their lives. It was in the same moments they learned which losses they couldn’t bear, that they also learned what must be restored. To return wholeness to their lives, sadness told my clients which way to walk.   

But depression didn’t work this way. When my depressed clients looked inward, their inner state offered them no wisdom, but only suffering’s dead eyes stared back. This amount of suffering was unsafe. It was unsafe because this type of pain is simultaneously extreme and pointless. Clients can endure extreme psychological pain if they have a good reason, but depression provides no such reason. It seems that depression is a pain without purpose.

So, these five differences between depression and sadness left me with a more limited definition of depression: it’s a state of despair or self-missingness that requires no identifiable cause. It includes a plurality of symptoms, it’s a departure from the authentic personality, and it’s also dangerous. It’s not about microwaving hotdogs or the news. Or it’s barely about microwaving hotdogs and the news. But as I started to understand depression in this way, two things happened. The first is it made it possible to reconsider how I thought about suicide. The second was that my work with my clients significantly changed.  

Disagreeing with the Depressed

It’s hard for me to overstate how difficult it is for me when my clients try to convince me that they cannot be helped. While they might concede that people shouldn’t wish to die, they often tell me there is one exception, and it’s them. They tell me that the details of their pain are unique, and that they’re a rare and untreatable case. Their suffering stands apart from the rest, and in this way, it’s superior. Sometimes depression can cleverly recruit a pinch of narcissistic grandiosity to increase a client’s despair. Bon appetite!

This creates a challenge because my training taught me to honor, and not to disagree with, the feelings of my clients. In my education, disagreement was to therapy what deodorant was to teenagers. They simply don’t go together. But when my depressed clients try to convince me that they can’t be helped, I’ve found careful disagreement to be important. While it’s true that disagreement can elicit defensiveness and early termination with clients, disagreement has been a a useful skill in the presence of a client’s hopelessness. I think this skill of careful disagreement can be especially useful when it’s implemented in two steps. When I don’t mess it up, these disagreements can sound like this:

Client: I’m going to give therapy my best, but honestly, nothing has ever worked. It’s hard to imagine that after trying therapy for 10 years, this will be different somehow.

Therapist: 10 years. I can’t even imagine that.

Client: Yeah, it’s pretty hard to get that across to people. I’m just one of those rare cases where you can’t make any real improvement. I mean, those cases exist, right? I just happen to be one of those cases.  

Before getting into the heart of the disagreement, I want to mention how helpful the phrase “I can’t even imagine that,” can be. When I was learning to become a therapist, I worried that unless I shared similar experiences with my clients, they would view me with suspicion. I was concerned they would think of me as someone who “doesn’t get it,” and I’d be exposed as the imposter I was convinced I was. I didn’t handle these insecurities well. Instead, I exaggerated the breadth of my own life experiences. The good ol’ therapeutic skill of misleading clients. A classic. I would find ways to connect my client’s experiences with my own, even when there weren’t real comparisons to be made. I hoped that this would reassure my clients that I was qualified to help them, but mostly, it allowed me to hide my imposter syndrome behind my flexible autobiography. In therapy, this was my hiding spot.

I eventually learned that it was better to handle my insecurities by acknowledging when I couldn’t relate. Not lying, I call it. A cutting-edge intervention, I know. But it wasn’t realistic to expect myself to contain the totality of human experience within my past, and when my clients thought our histories were more similar than they were, I was taking too many steps away from sincerus. For me, this style for building rapport was too far from “whole, pure, and clean.” Not only was stretching the truth of my personal history unethical, but I also risked that my clients could be left with the sense that their pain was unexceptional. “I’ve been there before,” didn’t necessarily carry a reassuring ring to it.

But once I accepted that my clients would experience many problems I would never experience, it became easier for me to tame my imposter syndrome. The truth is that personal experience isn’t a prerequisite for clinical competence. Instead, I think it’s better to share with my clients when the depths of their difficulties are hard for me to imagine experiencing. In the case of depression, most clients already know that most people haven’t felt the depth of depression’s deep waters, but when they hear that I know this too, something paradoxical happens — they know they’ve been heard.

Okay, enough about my poor character. I want to move back into the transcript. Here’s how the beginning of how cautious disagreement can occur:  

Therapist: Hm. That hit me a little different than I expected. Let me get some feedback from you, is that alright?

Client: Yeah, go for it.

Therapist: Well, I’m feeling two different things. The first is that I’m hurting for you. You’ve been through so much. But the other is when I hear you talk, I also feel this sense of protectiveness within myself. It’s like an urge to protect you, against you. I’m not sure you’re very fair with yourself. What do you make of that?

Client: Look, I don’t think I need your protection. I’m just saying I don’t think things will get better.

Therapist: Right, after trying therapy for 10 years, improvement sounds unrealistic.

Client: Bingo.  

Two things are going on here. The first is that I’m expressing disagreement by sharing my own feelings about their hopelessness. This is Step 1. There’s nothing to be gained by debating with my clients about whether they’re truly beyond help. This can leave them feeling less understood. But when I express how I feel about their hopelessness, this allows me to disagree without being disagreeable. For me, there’s usually a feeling of protectiveness that emerges, but sometimes there’s a feeling of sadness inside me, too.

There’s another part that I try to keep in mind when disagreeing with clients in their depressed state, and I think it’s the most important: I express my own hope about their situation. This is Step 2, and sometimes it sounds something like this:

Therapist: I gotcha. You know, if I’m honest, I wouldn’t ask you to feel hopeful at this point. My fear is it might feel too risky — like a setup for another letdown, and things have already been hard enough.

Client: Yeah, I’ve been through that. Having hope, and then things not working out. Done that several times.

Therapist: With all you’ve been through, not reaching for hope makes sense to me. I guess I’d like to share that in the meantime, I’ll be hopeful for the two of us. Maybe if you start seeing small improvement later, then you can join me, but for now I don’t want you to have hope. I can carry that part for us both.

My hope is that showing my clients that I understand why they’ve rejected hope can be an unexpected act of kindness. This might seem like a strange way to be supportive, but for many clients, I think hope can feel too vulnerable. Allowing themselves to become excited about the possibility of feeling better can seem risky, and so I encourage them to continue protecting themselves. But I also tell them that in the meantime, I’ll be hoping for the two of us. This lets them know that while I disagree with them about their prognosis, I won’t debate the matter — in our disagreement, I’m still on their side.    

Preventing Depressive Takeovers

That is how I practice expressing disagreement with my clients in their depressed states, but I think managing my private disagreements is just as important. Here is what I mean. I think disagreeing with my clients about the hopelessness of their improvement within myself is a precondition for honest therapy. How could I work with a client if we both agree that they’re beyond help? But in some cases, this private disagreement is a fluid process. There might be sessions when I find myself more optimistic about the client’s progress, and other sessions, less so.  

I think it’s important that when I find myself feeling less optimistic, that I treat this feeling with extreme caution. Hopelessness operates the way that yawning does – when one person yawns, others in the room will involuntarily follow. Hopelessness can also move across the room, and when spending hours in the presence of client hopelessness, it can spread across the therapeutic relationship and into myself. If I’m not careful, I can become worn down, and then I can become pessimistic about the client’s prognosis. When I join in the client’s hopelessness, I haven’t influenced the depression, but instead the depression has influenced me. The therapy itself has undergone a depressive takeover.

A depressive takeover is a phenomenon where a client’s distress spreads to the therapist over the course of therapy. The problem with these takeovers is that if I allow them to occur, my clients can sense that I share their pessimistic outlook, and this can reinforce their preexisting despair. Fortunately, I think there’s something that can be done to prevent this from occurring.

To prevent depressive takeovers, it has helped me to notice the connection between my being emotionally absorbent and the contagiousness of hopelessness. In my view, the more I’m sensitive to experiencing the feelings of others more generally, the more susceptible I am to the contagion of hopelessness. This means that there are rare moments in therapy when, for the sake of my clients, I attempt to become less emotionally porous. I try to shut my inner doors, and to absorb less of their experience.

To do this, I inwardly recite a phrase when I notice that I’ve started to feel pessimistic about their prognosis. I tell myself: that’s your mental health, not my mental health. Reciting this mantra in the privacy of my mind allows me to distance myself from my client’s experience. Creating this internal limit creates a pushing-away feeling, and it helps me close my emotional doors. It’s an empathy reduction exercise. When I create this distance from my clients, it helps me stand apart from the pull of hopelessness, prevent a depressive takeover, and remain hopeful for the two of us.   

The Arrow and Shield

Frank was 75 years old, and he’d never seen a therapist before, but he started saying things that made his adult children nervous and so they convinced him to speak with me. When he walked into my office, he got straight to the point. He told me he was ready to die, and shortly afterwards, he told me his name. Frank spoke with energy, “I’ve lived a full life. I’ve had children, grandchildren, and a lovely wife who died 10 years ago. The truth is that I’ve had everything I’ve ever wanted.” He continued, “I don’t want to get much older than this. I don’t want to become less recognizable to myself. I don’t want my kids to have to deal with that either.”

I was perplexed. It seemed like Frank’s desire to die was coming from a place of focused reflection. He wasn’t tearful, nor was he numb — he was grateful. I wasn’t sure if he was making a rational calculation about ending his life, or if he was under the influence of a depression that was undetectable to me. I took a breath and responded, “Frank. I’ll be honest with you. I’m not sure what to make of what you’re telling me, and I’m not completely sure how I should proceed. I’ve never been 75 years old, and I imagine it’s quite difficult, but I’m not sure if your wish to die is related to an underlying depression or not. If I take your word for it, I run the risk of overlooking this possibility, and that worries me. I hope this doesn’t sound too dismissive.”   

Frank nodded and I continued, “You mentioned you don’t want to put your kids in the position of helping you age. Can you teach me about that?”

“That’s big for me. I’m no use to anyone anymore. My kids are raising their kids, and they shouldn’t have to care for me, too. I can’t really give to them anymore; I can only take. I’m burdening the people I love the most.”

The word burden flashed in my mind. I felt a hunch and I wanted to test it. “Frank, this simply crossed my mind, and so tell me if this doesn’t fit, but I found myself wondering that if you were depressed, if you might hide it from your family. Maybe you’d worry that, in addition to your age, this would burden them, too. I’m only saying this because if you’re trying to protect your family by keeping things private, I’d hope you’d relax your protective nature with me. But tell me what I missed.”

We sat in silence as Frank looked out the window behind me. He clamped his palms together, cleared his throat, and we restarted the conversation.

Over the course of my therapy, I think it’s been useful to pay attention to the word “burden.” I’ve come to believe that this word, and the emotional experience to which it points, is the first part of suicide’s moral calculus. When my clients begin to think their existence is hurting others, being alive can start to feel like an ethical dilemma. “Should I stay alive if it harms those I love?” they might wonder.

This guilty feeling can become more dangerous when it’s coupled with a strong desire to protect their loved ones. I think this is the second part of suicide’s moral math. While suicide might look selfish from the outside, from the inside, clients often perceive suicide as the way to protect their loved ones from themselves.

With many of my clients who have survived their suicide attempts, they often express that while they were afraid of dying, it was their protective instinct that pushed them beyond this fear. From their vantage point, suicide was the right thing to do. They believed they were hurting their loved ones, and it was their responsibility to protect them. From within their suicidal mindset, many of my clients considered themselves both the arrow and the shield. It was the pulse of a self-sacrificing ethic that motivated them.    

***

As I look back at the therapist I was “back then,” and the clinician I have become, I realize that once I better understood depression and the moral dimension of suicide, this gave me something to work with in therapy. I learned that when my clients expressed the five depressing truths or when they believed they were a burden, there were things I could do to help. I could start by gently disagreeing with their hopelessness, disagreeing within myself to prevent depressive takeovers, and disagreeing with my clients when they’re convinced their loved ones should be protected from themselves. I am no longer terrified when the specter of suicide enters the therapeutic relationship.

Editor’s Note: In the next installment of this five-part series, the author will address strategies to address despair in therapy.    

Psychologists Struggle Too: How Shame Keeps Us Silent

Nothing breeds shame more than silence. If something is not spoken about or represented in our systems (e.g., family, workplace, industry), it can be considered wrong. This is why I have devoted my life to speaking out about mental health and, more recently, done so on a public stage as a psychologist who has experienced mental illness. I want to demystify the experience of mental illness in mental health professionals so they don’t suffer in silence, because we are, like the rest of the population, only human. However, it hasn’t always been that way for me.

Back in the 80s and 90s, when I was growing up, there were no representations or discussions of mental health or mental illness within the systems I was exposed to. The only thing you did hear was people being locked up because they were “crazy” or hearing the message that “you are weak if you have a mental illness.” And no one was talking about looking after their mental health, only physical health.

Struggling with Depression

So, when I struggled with my own mental health and eventually experienced clinical depression in my early 20s, I had no idea what was going on, and I didn’t dare speak up for fear of being seen as “less than.” I only received help when my partner contacted my parents for help, as he didn’t know what to do. While I did recover, I did so mostly on my own. I didn’t talk about it to others. I held a lot of shame for being depressed for many years.

Fast forward to my early 40s, early 2021. The world has changed drastically with how mental health and illness are represented and discussed, and I have about 20 years of study and working in the mental health arena under my belt. I now know differently that mental health is essential to care for, and mental illness is not a sign of weakness.

But despite all this, I once again suffered mentally, that time with a combination of burnout, vicarious trauma, and compassion fatigue. You would think that I would have reached out and spoken about my struggles this time with all that I knew and had learnt from my previous experience, but I kept quiet. I didn’t dare say anything because, once again, I felt deeply ashamed.

I felt ashamed and suffered silently for a couple of reasons. First, I believed that psychologists shouldn’t get mentally ill. I thought that, as a psychologist, I should have known better. I should have been able to prevent it. I thought that it somehow meant that I was not a capable psychologist. The other reason that compounded the first was that there was no representation or discussion of psychologists becoming mentally ill or working while managing their mental health or mental illness.

None of my peers, mentors, or senior psychologists ever discussed it. It was all under the radar and not out there for all to see. Outside of encouraging us to care for ourselves and seek professional help when needed, no psychologist or mental health professional I came across in training spoke of their own experiences of mental health struggles. Most likely, they didn’t feel safe to do so because nobody did for them. It wasn’t normalised or validated enough to feel safe to talk about it.

Speaking Out and Sharing Humanness

I only started speaking out about my mental health struggles as a psychologist when I began seeing a supervisor who could provide an environment where I felt safe to disclose my struggles. She was different from other supervisors I had. She was interested in my experiences and what was going on for me in the context of my work. She helped me to recognise my mental illness and take the necessary steps to recovery. She never made me feel like I was “less than,” nor did the psychologist I eventually saw for therapy.

More importantly, they both shared their humanness with me, their struggles, enough to help me debunk my belief that psychologists should be able to prevent their own mental illnesses. These experiences gave me the courage to share mine more with others, and as I did, I discovered that many psychologists and other professionals were also struggling with their mental health and changing how they worked to care for their mental health. It helped me drop the shame I had held for being a psychologist with mental illness.

Having had such a powerful experience of having my mental illness normalised by other people in my field, it became a passion of mine to pay it forward; to continue to change the culture of mental health professionals to one where we can talk freely about our mental health and what we need to take care of it; to recognise mental illness and support each other through it. I now share my mental illness story wide and far through various mediums, writing blog articles, appearing on podcasts, producing a lived-experience podcast, publishing my memoir, and providing therapy to fellow clinicians and others from different professions suffering from burnout.

I still fear sharing my story with fellow psychologists. I know this comes from being someone out on the fringe of my profession speaking out about this, but more robust than my fear is my compassion to help fellow mental health professionals drop any shame with struggling mentally. I can do that by sharing my mental illness experiences and mental health struggles. I don’t want another fellow psychologist or anyone to suffer in silence. We are only human.

Virtual Treatment of Eating Disorders and the Importance of Human Connection

Be the person you needed when you were younger

-Ayesha Siddiqi

The Virtual World

I could never comprehend the idea of virtual eating disorder treatment. It would be so easy for clients to hide their food or engage in disordered behaviors behind a screen. How could I really connect? Especially with my young clients, I imagine them secretly watching Netflix behind the computer screen while I try and explore their deepest fears.

Cut to Covid! The world shut down, and my ideas on virtual treatment shifted as this became the new reality for all therapists. I have always worked with eating-disordered clients in one way or another since before I even completed graduate school. After working with eating disorders in community mental health, I started to burn out with the lack of support and knowledge in the field. As a recovered clinician, eating disorders are my passion and the reason I became a therapist. This is the population I want to work with, but this is also the most complex population which requires a complete treatment team and effective provider collaboration.

For my professional sanity — and to continue this career without burning out — I needed to shift gears and investigate a more supportive environment in which to treat eating disorders. The thing is: I live in a place where you must travel at least an hour to get to any eating disorder treatment center, which would mean I would have to travel at least an hour to work at one. While I was offered a position at one of these centers, I saw myself continuing the burn out with the commute and two young children at home.

As fate would have it, the treatment center connected me with their virtual eating disorder partial hospitalization program, which, as it just so happened, was hiring. I was still very hesitant but wanted to keep my mind open. I’d been through many treatment centers as a young teen — I know ALL the tricks. How could I help anyone, virtually? It was during my interview process that I came to the realization that there are many places where treatment is unavailable. What if this is the only treatment available to some individuals due to lack of transportation, living distances, or family circumstances? Would it have helped me as a teen if it were my only option? I must give this a shot. I must explore how I can best support this population virtually, because this is the only thing available to some individuals.

So, I made my decision to hop on the virtual train. It took some adjusting, soundproofing, and office plants to make the switch manageable — at least on my end.

The Young Anorexic Client

The sound machine is roaring.

Two boxes appear on my screen.

One screen showing my face, the other showing that of a new, adolescent client.

She is starting our program today after being discharged from a residential treatment center. I am meeting with her to introduce myself and complete a risk assessment. She admits that she is not thrilled to be on virtual, but that there are no other options near her. Her parents and treatment team are forcing her to complete this program. She admits to knowing that she needs it, and she is a minor, so her parents have leverage. She presents guarded, as teens usually do, waiting to see if I pass the obligatory therapist “vibe check.” I appreciate the honesty but notice the apathy in her voice. This is going to be a difficult client to connect with. I must learn how to connect with her.

Finding Connection

If I’ve learned anything about the virtual world, it is the importance of finding the ability to connect. Yes, it is more difficult virtually than when you are in person, but still doable. In fact, some people open up more through a virtual encounter because they feel safety in distance. New research has shown that the brain neuropathways activate more with in-person interactions. Which means I have to be more creative about forging a meaningful connection. (1)

Because the individual on the other side of the screen can’t get a sense of my “vibe,” and because a digital image of myself elicits different responses from neuropathways, I must rely on building rapport quickly.

I’ve learned the hard way, through moments of uncomfortable silence, that this sometimes requires talking about random teen trivia to get young clients to feel safe with me. My clients are experts in their life. I am merely a guest. The more my clients let me into their world, the more I can show them tools that will appropriately work for them. I have to meet my clients where they are at.

I find the best way to build trust is to find out their interests and build on that. That doesn’t mean I just pretend that I want to know about their interests. I mean taking the time to learn about them and ask deep questions. This helps me understand my clients and what treatment approach works best for them. My job is not to heal my clients. My job is to help them learn the tools to heal themselves.

Only with trust can a client effectively “buy-in” to what I am talking about regarding treatment. Why would anyone talk to me if I don’t feel safe? Building connections and creating a therapeutic alliance is about helping clients understand that you are a safe person.

Young teens are my favorite clients to work with. The most important part of effectively working with teens is to teach them to build connections that are stronger and safer than their eating disorder. The first safe connection might be with their therapist. The eating disorder is my client’s safest and most secure relationship. Which is why it is so difficult to recover from — it works.

The eating disorder becomes an entity of its own that protects the clients from trauma, rejection, fear, and most importantly has the capacity to numb. For clients with significant trauma or poor attachments, the predictability of this disorder is comforting. Ironically, it is providing them a mental refuge while slowly killing them. Accepting and understanding that the eating disorder has served a function for my clients is the most important starting point towards genuine connection. The eating disorder is my client’s biggest and most secure connection.

The Young Adolescent Client

The session starts the same.

Two screens.

Sound machine whirring.

I will call this client Abby.

Abby is hunched down on the floor with her laptop facing her. She is anxious and having difficulty sitting still as evidenced by a bouncing leg. This is not her first time in treatment. She has already told me she does not prefer virtual but has no other options at this time. By this point in our sessions together, we have discussed the usual eating disorder behaviors and worked on increasing Abby’s ability to talk back to the eating disorder voice. The ability to assist her in calling out the eating disorder is crucial. That means knowing how the eating disorder talks. Hint: it’s sneaky and insidious.

Since working together, what stands out about Abby is her increasing discomfort with the present moment. It is more than the eating disorder; I know the look of unresolved trauma. Abby is living in fight or flight. Her eating disorder being taken from her is forcing her to confront difficult traumatic experiences.

Abby started Cognitive Processing Therapy while in residential care but stopped it when the therapist realized she was not benefiting from the therapeutic intervention. So, what can I do here now virtually?

New research has shown that treating PTSD and the eating disorder at the same time yields better results for both. (2, 3) This is contrary to what was first taught to professionals about only treating one at a time.

I worked with Abby for some time, but Abby’s mother’s insurance eventually changed, and her parents no longer wanted her to participate in our program for understandable financial reasons (This is another aspect of eating disorder treatment that is complicated).

Abby will need long term therapeutic intervention for her complex trauma and the increasing severity of the eating disorder. Her motivation for recovery continues to wax and wane.

Let me explain what we were able to do virtually and how.

My work with Abby explored relationship patterns, boundaries, and the impact her trauma has had on her eating disorder relapse and recovery process. Abby learned evidence based therapeutic interventions to effectively talk back to cognitive distortions and her eating disorder voice.

And while all of this work was pivotal, I want to emphasize what got us there…

Soccer!

I know you are thinking. What is she talking about?

Hear me out. Gaining trust from my adolescent clients must come first.

The connection I made with Abby was as simple as soccer. Soccer was Abby’s motivation for recovery, soccer made her feel confident and alive. Soccer activated neuropathways in Abby that allowed her to feel seen by me.

All of the in-depth work that needed to be done started and ended with soccer. Ultimately all of the work that was done on a virtual platform started and ended with my ability to see my client and connect. In the end, my initial reluctance about working virtually with eating-disordered teens was largely unfounded. I would likely have encountered similar challenges had I worked face-to-face with Abby. It was the connection that built the bridge and soccer that reinforced it.

References

(1) Neuroscience News. (2023). Zoom conversations vs in-person: Brain activity tells a different tale. Neuroscience News, 27 Oct.

(2) Perlman, M. D. (2023). Concurrent treatment of eating disorders and PTSD leads to long-term recovery.” Psychiatric Times, Times, 17 Oct.

(3) Brewerton, Timothy. D. (2007). Eating disorders, trauma, and comorbidity: Focus on PTSD. The Journal of Treatment & Prevention. 15(4). 285-304.

Rick Miller on the Clinical Challenges of Working with Gay Sons, Mothers, and Families

Gay Sons and Their Mothers

Lawrence Rubin (LR): You may be known to our readers as the founder of Gay Sons and Mothers. But they may not be familiar with how extensively you’ve been trained and how long you've been practicing as a psychotherapist with a personal interest in working with gay men and their mothers. 

Rick Miller (RM): I'm a gay man who grew up really appreciating the bond and love of my mother. And, in hindsight, as an adult, what it meant for me was that I got to be myself. She didn't necessarily know that I was gay, or maybe she did, but she never forced me to do anything differently than what I did.

And growing up in a world in the 1960s where it was prescribed, this is what boys do, having a mom who let me be me — and we did a lot of things together — was pretty miraculous. I hear so many stories about people growing up whose parents abused them or forced them to do things differently.

I wrote a book several years ago for clinicians about doing hypnosis with gay men. I thought it would be relevant to do the research or to seek out research about gay men and their mothers. I looked at the literature about gay men and their mothers to include in the book. You'd think this a cliché topic and that there would be way too much information to use. I couldn't find anything! I thought, I’ll write an article about this, and it ended up turning into video interviews. And from there, I started a nonprofit called Gay Sons and Mothers.

We are educating the public about the special bond between mothers and their gay sons and how she contributes to his sense of well-being in the world. It's a multicultural story that looks at strength, at disappointment, and is a very emotional topic.   

LR: So, even before you and your mother had a conversation about being gay and you knew, you had no particular concern over sharing it with your mom. You didn’t worry how she would take it, how you'd be perceived, how you'd be treated. You were just free from the start to be you. 

RM: Well, I was free to be me, but I didn't come out to them — meaning my parents, my mother and my father — until I was 21. So, it was interesting that I had the freedom to be me, but I didn't feel 100 percent free to be me because I waited longer to come out than I probably needed to in hindsight. Today, many kids are coming out at a much younger age to their parents. Of course, the world is very different.

LR: If you intuitively felt accepted by your mom and weren’t censored or limited in any way from being you — you haven't talked about your dad — why do you think it took you as long as it did to become public about it? 

RM: Well, so, it was the early 80s. So, AIDS was hitting the press big time, and I suppose on one level, I was protecting her or them from thinking that something would happen to me, which, knock on wood, did not happen. I was afraid that I'd be rejected, and, not to sound callous, they were paying for my graduate school education, and I just made a mental note in my mind I was going to wait until I finished school to come out, which is so stupid. 

Knowing my parents, of course, they wouldn't have done anything differently. It took them a while to come around, a month or so, which I thought was horrible at the time. But I look back and I think that my parents had to go through their own grieving when I came out to them. Of course, they knew I was gay long before I came out, but hearing it was definitive. And it took them a short time to acclimate and appreciate it. I was incensed at the time. And, often, I say to children and to parents, it's okay to grieve.

LR: Incensed about? 

RM: They were not 100 percent supportive the second I came out to them. And the first thing my father did when I came out was to become a little weepy saying, “the world is unfair, and I'm worried about what that will mean for you.” I took it as supportive, for sure. And then he kind of changed the tune for a bit, and that is when things turned ugly, and again that lasted a few weeks and then everything turned around. 

LR: Smooth sailing with your parents and especially your mom ever since. 

RM: Yep. And I had a partner that I was moving in with at the time. So, what I did, which I shouldn't have done, was when I came out to them, I told them that I was moving in with the person they knew as my friend all at once, so that threw them a little bit. 

LR: Overload! Going back to the second part of the earlier question about your foundation; how do you think clinicians can benefit from awareness of it? 

RM: There's so much inherent in the videos that we share through Gay Sons and Mothers. It's not only about the relationship between a mother and a son, but that part in and of itself is so affirming. Clinicians can watch stories of sons and their mothers and appreciate what it is being gay. And it's not only mother in these interviews. Families are talked about. Extended families are talked about. Culture and religion are addressed in these videos.

So, there's a lot there, and, when mothers are struggling with their kids, I send them videos from Gay Sons and Mothers. On our website, there's a link to our Instagram page. We have a YouTube page. Sons watch. Most people — therapists included — watch these videos and have a deep emotional resonance around the issue of being included, being loved, being supported, being rejected. It's hard not to feel something when you're watching videos pertaining to these themes.   

LR: A connection. How would you respond to a therapist or to a non-therapist who’s visited your site and says, “Yeah, well, what about gay sons and their fathers?” 

RM: There's way more information in the literature about gay sons and their fathers than there is about gay sons and their mothers. And if there hadn't been any with fathers, I would have pursued that, as well. I grew up with a great relationship with my mother. I had the fame of saying to my siblings, “Mommy likes me best.” It carried me through. So, it seems completely perfect that that would be the focus of my work.  

Historically, mothers in the 1970s — or even earlier in the psychiatric and the medical field — mothers were blamed for making their sons gay. And, so, with the lack of literature out there, what's missing is that mothers have the power to raise sons who are mentally healthy, just from being a good enough mother. And, so, that premise is so important to me that I've focused exclusively on mothers and sons.

The issue of fathers and extended family is embedded in the work anyway. So, this project, Gay Sons and Mothers, is inclusive of the entire family. And we're also expanding beyond just gay sons and mothers. We're talking about trans children and all sorts of things. 

Intersecting Identities

LR: How has your advocacy and clinical work been informed by your own personal evolution? 

RM: Oh, gosh, that's such a big question, but I think I can get there. I came out in 1983 — I was already a clinical social worker. In the 1980s, AIDS was emerging, and gay men were dying in big cities, and people were afraid. Homophobia was on the rise because people were afraid of catching AIDS. I was working in the AIDS field, doing volunteer work at this time, and I started working with the gay community from the start.

Boston, where I lived, was a progressive place. So, I was known in Boston as being an out gay male therapist. I mean, there was no web at that time, but anyone who knew me would know that I was gay. But I was also practicing in a very conservative place, Boston, Massachusetts, very hierarchical, very psychodynamic. So, in the professional world that wasn't the world of AIDS, I worked in a hospital. I kept a very low profile, and I felt like I didn't fit in the hierarchy of psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers.   

I'm a social worker, and looking back at my evolution and my history, I wish I had put myself out there more because the contributions that I'm now making to the field in the last ten years as a writer, as a teacher, as someone who's done Gay Sons and Mothers, if I had the confidence to do some of this earlier, I would have done more research focusing on gay men, on gay men and their mothers, gay families. And I think I could have made a bigger contribution to the field.

What happened for me is I started my private practice in the mid 80s, and I switched to full-time private practice. So, I left the hospital. I left the agency where I was doing AIDS work, and basically, I hid in my office with the door closed for decades. And I was very successful in private practice, in part because of my clinical skills, in part because of my personality, and I got to hide.

Once I wrote my first book and I started teaching about working with gay men, I could no longer hide. And, at the time, I was probably 52 years old — 10 years ago. And I'm really glad it happened, but it forced me beyond a comfort level that was really important and good for me, and I wish I did that sooner.  

LR: So, you came out of the closet before you came out of the office. I can see that your personal story could be used as an exemplar, not only for gay therapists, but for gay men, whether still not out or out. I would imagine that you don't impose your story on others. But by living it and being genuine, as you've always struck me, you are an unintended role model.

RM: Well, thank you for saying that, and it served me very well in my practice. I grew up in an upper-middle-class family with well-being and mental health and good physical health. And, to me, that's how everyone lived in the world, and that is so not the case. And so, as a gay man who had a sense of self, who worked with gay men, I served as a role model to other gay men, to all my clients really but specifically to other gay men who didn't have the good fortune that I did or didn't have the personality that I did.  

So, my being outgoing was a very good clinical skill, and, fortunately, in my early 20s, I was in therapy with a therapist who was gay, who had a very good sense of himself, who had a great sense of humor, and who allowed me in the process of therapy to love myself. If I had chosen one of those uptight, analytical therapists in Boston instead, I don't know where I would be right now.

When I was looking for a therapist, I was given the name of eight different people. Back in 1983, I was calling their answering machines. On some, I was hanging up because I was frightened by them. Others shamed me through their tone, and thank God, I didn't work with them. 

Clinical Challenges of Working with Gay Men (and their Mothers)

LR: What are some of the clinical challenges you've found in working with gay sons and their mothers? 

RM: Long before I ever knew I'd be working with gay men and their mothers, I had a gay male client who was really struggling with confidence. He grew up in the projects outside of Boston, and his father left the family, and deprivation was a big part of his upbringing. So, one day, for whatever reason, I had his mother join him in a session and it was like the heavens opened up.  

I understood him so much more, and the bond and the strength of their relationship was amazing. It helped so much in the clinical work. He was a catalyst that led to this project, Gay Sons and Mothers. Every now and then, I'd have another mother and son together, but it wasn't why they were in therapy. Once I started working on this project, various people consulted with me, families for help with their families. For some, in the field of psychotherapy, for others, through the nonprofit where, for free, I just consult with people and help them along.  

What's been interesting is one mother and son that I'm working with right now in therapy are enmeshed with each other, and they're seeing me every two weeks. On certain days, it feels like couples therapy and I really have to work with them to detangle and let go of their expectations with each other. And, so, this is a divorced mom with an only child who's gay, and they expect each other to meet needs that goes well beyond what they should be for a mother and a son.

This isn't the case in all circumstances, but I think it's a great example of how it can be a bit of a burden on both ends to have this close bond that goes kind of way too far on both ends.   

LR: So, enmeshment is one of the challenges. I imagine acceptance is another. 

RM: So many gay men are way too careful, and they're not coming out to their families as soon as they might, or they give absolutely no details about their private lives to their families who really want more from them. So, that is another challenge, that in being careful, even once they come out, being careful continues to be their MO, even when they don't need to be, and people want more from them. They want to hear more details about their day-to-day lives or what they struggle with, or are they in a relationship with someone?

LR: And I wonder if these particular men are so cautious and close to the chest with their families, if they're even more so outside of the home. 

RM: Correct. I'm working with a bunch of men in their 50s, let's say in their 60s, who came out in an era where it wasn't okay to be gay. And even though it's fine now and they have jobs where they are out, they, without even realizing it, are kind of slipping into modes of privacy and protecting themselves because it's a habit that's been with them through their life.

LR: I was going to ask you a little bit later about working with elderly gay men. But this seems like a good point to interject the question of, “what are some of the clinical challenges in working with elderly gay men whose mothers, I imagine, have long passed?”

RM: The most significant challenge is that they grew up in an era where they couldn't be out, where it wasn't safe, and many older men were kind of forced indirectly or even directly to live conventional lives and got married and had children without even questioning the freedom of living life as a gay man.

I had a great-uncle who was gay, and he never came out to my family. When I came out to my parents, they said, “Well, Paul has lived a good life. So, we know that you'll live a good life, too.” But this great-uncle, my grandmother's brother, was in his 80s when I came out. And he said to me, “I really appreciate that you have freedom that I didn't have, and I hope that you will keep my secret from your family because I just don't feel comfortable being out there.” 

LR: Well, I wonder if that fear of abandonment, being cast out by remaining family is that much greater to an elderly man?

RM: He had an incredible social network. He lived in Washington and was cryptographer for the CIA because keeping secrets was something that they did well. So, he had the love of a community of people, and my mother, his niece, and us, meaning my mother's children who were generations below him. And he was still worried about our knowing. It was just a pattern that was ingrained for the time with which he was raised. It's that simple.

LR: Can you imagine taking homosexuality, or any significant part of your identity, to the grave?

RM: When he died, my mother and I went to Washington to clean out his house — he saved everything. There was a pile of letters that his gay friends wrote to him in the 1950s and the 1960s about falling in love with men that they met in cruising areas in parks, and how they couldn't tell their spouses and how tortured they were.

We were cleaning out his house with three of his close friends. My mother came to me, without saying anything, handed me the pile of letters, and I read them. And I thought poor Uncle Paul would die if I kept these letters, so I shredded them and threw them out. And it is my biggest regret because in these letters was the reality of gay history lived by all these men.

But, in my desire to be loyal to my great-uncle, I threw them out. And this was maybe three or four years after I had come out. I was still living in a careful way and more worried about loyalties. If I had these letters now, what they would mean? Oh my God.  

LR: What clinical challenges have you experienced working with gay sons of mothers from other cultures, the Caribbean culture, the Asian, the Southeast Asian, or even African, where homosexuality is shunned and punished, sometimes even fatally?  

RM: In these cultures, homophobia is rampant and masculinity and norms around masculinity are such that fathers are not accepting of their gay kids. Religious norms are such that being gay is a sin and these are beliefs that communities buy into without questioning. So, fathers are often emotionally and physically abusive to their sons. Mothers are forced to choose between their husband or their child.

Some mothers choose their husband over their child. I had a guy that I interviewed who was Latino, and his mother said to him, “First comes God, then comes your father, and then comes you.” So, when he came out, they sent him to an aunt's house far away to Texas where he would somehow have a different life for himself. He ended up responding to a personal ad from someone who he didn't know at the time was a human sex trafficker, and he became a victim of human sex trafficking. It's a tragic story, and he's now an advocate for all of this. But his parents kicked him to the curb and still don't accept him. 

LR: Have you worked with men and mothers and their parents from other cultures, where the parents themselves were afraid of being sanctioned, punished, or harmed?

RM: You're saying that with a great degree of sensitivity and attunement. Most situations, that is exactly what the parents are feeling, but they don't recognize that in themselves. What they recognize is what they're supposed to believe, and that's what they've gone along with. I've worked with Mormon families who have rejected their children. I've interviewed a Latino Mormon man whose mother read his journal and packed up his bedroom one night and put all his belongings in the garage and said, “You're not going to live here anymore. What you're doing is a sin.”  

Eventually, they came around and made up years later. These horror stories unfortunately exist. Some families that are less severe than the examples I gave don't let their kids come to family holidays. They insist that they not come out to extended family that there’s all these conditions. There's a woman named Caitlin Ryan who’s done a lot of research through her organization called the Family Acceptance Project. Her work shows that LGBTQ family members can gain acceptance with their children or their siblings through being exposed to other people that give a message that it's okay.

And that's essentially what we're doing through Gay Sons and Mothers. We're sharing stories saying, “Look, we're out in the world and everything is fine.” And as family members realize that it's okay, they are far more accepting of their gay children. So, that's the message that we need to get out into the Latino, the Asian, the Black communities, and the best way that they're going to accept it is by hearing stories through people like themselves.

If they're hearing from a gay social worker who's White that it's okay, maybe some percentage of people will listen to me and be comforted, but they're going to hear it most from another father who's found through his own experiences that it's better to have a relationship with their child than to reject them.   

And that's essentially what we're doing through Gay Sons and Mothers. We're sharing stories saying, “Look, we're out in the world and everything is fine.” And as family members realize that it's okay, they are far more accepting of their gay children. So, that's the message that we need to get out into the Latino, the Asian, the Black communities, and the best way that they're going to accept it is by hearing stories through people like themselves.

If they're hearing from a gay social worker who's White that it's okay, maybe some percentage of people will listen to me and be comforted, but they're going to hear it most from another father who's found through his own experiences that it's better to have a relationship with their child than to reject them.

LR: I imagine there’s a significant number of these families that don’t make it successfully through therapy with you. This young man is left feeling just as isolated and rejected as before.

RM: Right. Or the young man will stay in therapy and build his own community, but, unfortunately, not with his family, outside of the family and elsewhere. That said, I am a family therapist. I’m a couples therapist. I'm totally optimistic. I never give up on families reuniting. And, last year, I worked with a fundamentalist gay man in his 30s, really successful in his career and in his life. But he didn't come out until his 30s to please his parents. I had three joint sessions with him and his mother, with the hopes of bringing them together. He never thought it would happen.

I met with her alone first, and she was talking about the Bible and blah, blah, blah, blah. They didn't stick with the sessions, and eventually started talking to each other. A couple of months ago, she was potentially diagnosed with cancer, and that's what brought them together more than anything else. And I wish it could have been sooner.

LR: How would you advise straight therapists working with gay men, beyond the standard of “unconditional acceptance?”   

RM: You raise a very important issue about unconditional acceptance, and many well-intentioned straight therapists try way too hard with their gay clients. In my life, socially, I'll go to a party, and they'll say, “Oh, do you live where all the gay people live? And do you know so and so, and so and so, and so, and so?”

LR: Gay Jewish geography.

RM: Exactly, and often I do. But therapists who try to promote unconditional acceptance and convince their clients that they're gay-affirming and then offer, “Oh, I have a neighbor who's gay,” which actually may induce a lack of trust. The best way to promote unconditional acceptance is to simply say, “I’m straight. Are you comfortable working with me? I am accepting, and I've worked with other gay clients. But, please, if you feel any bit of discomfort, let me know. Let's talk about it.” To me, that's unconditional acceptance, and that's more welcoming than doing a sales pitch that ends up sounding like a microaggression more than anything else.

So, my mentor, Jeff Zeig, accepted me for who I was, and he’s a straight man. There was something so profound in that experience for me. Was he the first straight man that accepted me? No, but it was wonderful to have a mentor who didn't care if I was gay, didn't pathologize me, and said, “Write a book about working with gay men, the field is lacking this information.” It was so validating. And so, what he did for me, which all therapists ideally do for their clients, is embrace, love, support, and send me out into the world to be successful.

That is unconditional love, and that is what straight therapists can do for their gay clients. And what I say in the work that I do is you're giving your clients a bigger gift of healing than you would even recognize because your clients are coming into your office with their presenting problem, whatever that happens to be. It may have nothing to do with being gay. And, through the love and the acceptance and the respect that you're showing to them, they're getting additional healing from the experience of being in your office.  

So, frequently, when people want a referral to a therapist who's a gay client, frequently I'll say, “Why don't you work with a non-gay therapist? Because there is extra work that you can have done, as a result.” Some people will do that, some people won't.

LR: I used to think it important to be colorblind, but we must see color to validate the experience of the “other.” that idea. Similarly, one can’t be gay blind, because being blind to that does not suggest acceptance. It suggests walling off and not affirming that person, not accepting that person. So, I imagine that a clinician working with a gay person has to be very cognizant of the stories, the history that this person brings into therapy.

RM: Yes. The words that are coming to my mind are cultural competence. And that's what we need in the field these days. And I, too, did the same that you just described. I worked with an Asian gay man and a Black gay man, and I cringe when I think to myself or I even probably said things aloud that it's not as bad as you perceive it to be, which is absolutely not true.

LR: It’s not affirming.

RM: Right. The best thing that we can do is to hear the experiences that our clients are bringing to our offices and trust that to be true. The other best thing that we can do to become culturally competent is to go to workshops or watch videos like this or read a few books or speak to your gay friends and family members about their experiences to get educated. It's not hard to do. I find that in our field of mental health there are many people who are well-educated and liberal in their thinking, so that they feel like they have all that they need to know.

But their gay clients are testing them indirectly and don't feel safe because they're presenting a norm that may be uncomfortable. The other thing that I found, and I've mentioned this to you before, is that the field in general, of course, is run by metrics and numbers. And the most successful clinicians and teachers in the field have large numbers of followers and huge turnouts to their conferences. When I teach, sometimes I get 20-25, maybe 40 attendees, if I'm lucky, at a big mental health conference. Well, that's not good for the conference.

So, I'm not advancing as I'm teaching about working with LGBTQ people. And there are very few courses offered at huge conferences, which is unfortunate. So, my advice to people who are organizing conferences is to put us in panels with other people, and that way we can kind of gain exposure and educate people.

LR: So, the idea of a gay-affirming therapist is more cliché than anything else I would think because if you're not a person-affirming therapist, you're not going to be a gay-affirming therapist. Am I getting it, right? 

RM: Yeah, yeah. And I mean, interesting. A clinician that's worked a lot with the gay man or the LGBTQ population by nature is gay-affirming. I know through conversations with a person who has worked a lot with the LGBTQ population is gay-affirming, and they've cultivated acceptance and skills that are affirming and comfortable. As a person, are you a gay-affirming person? I'm not asking you that. I know that you are, but I'm asking people who are listening to this. Do you understand what it's like living life as an LGBTQ person in today's world?

And if you're honest with yourself, maybe there are things you don't understand, and there's ways of getting information. If you pretend that you are, you're fooling yourself. People are going to see beyond that.

LR: They’re going to catch up.

RM: So, when you go to therapy, you should be talking about your sexual life. Many gay clients, out of shame, won't even broach the idea of sex with their therapists. Or, when they talk about sex, their therapist winced because they don't believe in open relationships, or they think that gay men are too sexual, and their biases are coming forward. I h

Dialogue 1: How Do We Define Collaborative Writing?

Editor's Note: In this “dialogue” between client (Daniel X. Harris) and therapist (Trish Thompson), the co-authors explore how collaborative writing that focuses on the therapeutic relationship can be a powerful tool for building trust, multiple dimensions, and humor. They also explore some of the ethical questions surrounding this kind of work and note that the entries do not always run sequentially, “as the themes they explore circle back and around, more like circuits of curiosity than a linear journal.”

Defining Collaborative Writing

Trish Thompson: Dan, so what do we mean when we say collaborative writing? Does it have to be writing with each other, or can it be writing to each other? Or can it be considered more broadly, including things like one-way writing about collaborative sessions?

Daniel X. Harris: This is an interesting question, Trish, and one (in my view) that is framed by disciplinary considerations. There are different ways of responding to it, whether you are coming from psychotherapeutic, autoethnographic, narrative writing or creative writing perspectives. One entry point might be the work of Jane Speedy, who is both an academic and narrative therapist. Her 2017 book, Narrative Inquiry and Psychotherapy, offers many responses to your questions. For example, Speedy offers, “My own interest in narrative research is very much as a collaborative co-inquirer, first in relation to the problems that have come to overshadow and shape peoples’ lives, and secondly in terms of re-telling these stories in writing” (1). Further, she defines “meaning-making as collaborative activities and “reality” as the space between people engaged in conversation.”

There is no hard and fast rule. It can mean a wide range of things, but if it is “collaborative,” I think there has to be that element of working together, not just reporting to each other what we have done individually or independently. For example, you have described using writing with other clients in which they write to you things between sessions. If you read those works and then you work on the content in their session, I would not consider that collaborative writing. If you both read your writings to each other, and change each other in that exchange, then for me that’s moving into the realm of collaborative. Or maybe, more accurately, that would be considered “interdependent” writing! Yalom (2) falls somewhere in there, I think. While I appreciate the efficacy of those approaches, and the many diverse ways in which writing is used in art therapy, I’m more interested in the mutuality of what we have done together. That to me is the “radical” bit: how can one part of a pair (the client) be helped by the therapist’s trained knowledge, through a multi- directional exchange that requires vulnerability and sharing from both sides? That’s truly collaboration.  

Thompson: Ah yes, I like what you are saying here. It makes me think about our writing process, particularly for this book, and the different ways we worked together. What about when we recorded a Zoom chat and then converted the conversation to text? Didn’t seem to make a heap of sense on the page. Technology at fault, surely! Our writing sessions were more productive — 45 mins of writing, screens off (I wonder if your dogs are at your feet?), and then sharing what we had written after. You had always written about three times as much as me, the words pouring out of you, capturing your experience so evocatively. But for me, it is slow work, as if I have to coax out reluctant words that are not sure whether they should show up in case they don’t get along together when they arrive on the page, despite my pleading! I remember telling you about my writing imposter syndrome, saying that there are so many great (much better) writers out there, what do I think I’m doing? And you said something like, “here is room for lots of writers to be out there.” That was so helpful to me.

Harris: Trish, what difference does it make to co-write for publication, rather than just as a therapeutic tool (and does that mean they have to be good writers)? 

Thompson: The first question I ask myself whenever I write something is, “who is the audience?”

This to me is fundamental in shaping the purpose of the words. Using writing as a therapeutic tool has its focus in deepening the shared understanding of the issues being explored in sessions. It is endlessly provoking in the material it continues to throw up. I am writing with a client at the moment, and the face-to-face sessions are so enlivened by the picking up of the threads of the email exchange, once they have also been through the reflective cycle. This client uses visual imagery to great effect in her writing, which I love and respond to. She says she loves how I capture and summarise her therapeutic journey so clearly. But this co-creation is done with little thought to skill or form, it is just about an illustration of our process that continues to build connection. But if a client/therapist pair are writing for publication, they are allowing others into the intimate space of therapy because they believe that what they have to say will be of benefit to others. It could raise feelings of vulnerability when imagining what are usually confidential words reaching the eyes of an unknown audience. I think if therapy writing is to be published, it would be important that the client and therapist can write well enough to convey meaning, create interest and inspire the audience (gulp!). The ethics of this issue are also touched on in Dialogue 3.

When Narratives Meet

We wonder how therapist narratives and different parts of them might enter the space and connect with the narratives/parts of the client? We argue that the meeting point/s of these narratives can be a catalyst for change in both the client and therapist. As Speedy states, collaborative writing between therapist and client, researcher and researched, can “take issue with the low- and high- ground positions in relation to “writing” and “research”… and to promote and encourage ideas of scholarship (alongside research) within the therapeutic domain as collaborative …” This problematisation of the unequal power dynamic that typically haunts both kinds of engagement is at the heart of this book.      

Harris: Collaborative writing doesn’t have to be of equal investment. Clients are looking for witnessing more than a therapist would. They don’t need the writing to witness/reflect them. It’s okay that what the client gets out of it is different from what the therapist gets out of it. Narrative therapy tells us that what a lot of the therapeutic work does, written or not, is bearing witness to someone’s pain or joy or hardship. Validating. It takes the experience from being in one’s psyche to being made real in “real life.” Validating the difficulty of an experience.

But what allowed Trish to accept that invitation? What allowed her to become playful in ways that I experienced as deeper, more or different than in the room? We agree there is something alchemical in the movement of being in, stepping out, looking. This is both a feeling and also is materially and spatially shown by the text and the comments down the side. We were doing that together. It wasn’t just Trish going to supervision and thinking about the therapeutic work.

It felt like there was a collaboration going on around what was going on. There was a shared analysis of what we were doing. Some therapeutic models absolutely flatten the hierarchy: the therapist is not there to tell the client what it “means,” or what to do.

What did it feel like for Trish? You don’t often get a client doing that. Reflecting on the last session, or the work, or where this was helpful – you invite it, but it doesn’t happen a lot. Therapists spend a lot of time wondering if techniques work or not. We have talked a lot about the tendency of therapists to workshop these questions with one another, but less so with clients. How would you know if something worked, if you didn’t ask the client?

This collaborative process speaks to something deeper in Trish, rather than therapist Trish. She doesn’t want to assume or believe things if they’re wrong. She wants to know. This kind of dynamic has been a long-term struggle for her, so the explicit-ness of the conversation in the writing (of the first article) really jazzed her because “the dialogue is open.” You get to know, understand, no matter how hard it is; so much better than wondering. We think that’s why Yalom did that exchange of, “I’ll write my version and you write yours.” He talks about how there are some moments he thinks are pivotal successes, but then the clients debunk that.  

Thompson: What I have particularly enjoyed in the collaborative writing with you, Dan, is the energy I felt when reading something you had written. I would then have a rush of ideas and start making connections – with things we had talked about in the past, with things that were happening in my life, or questions I wanted to ask you or other clients. And then in writing a response, something would click in me about my own journey in finding myself. The writing constantly challenged my self-perceptions.

May 2023: I have been reading your chapter Unstable Sense of Self. So many emotions came up for me. And then the anger came. People don’t see. People think they know better. And because of this you have to endure the experience of the deep knowing that comes from a life’s work of amazing “you-ness” being minimised, whether it is by psychiatrists or dramaturgs. God, who doesn’t want a play that makes you laugh and scares you shitless at the same time?  

“Taking Charge” as Collaborators and as Client/Therapist (29 November, 2020)

Thompson: I’m interested in the idea that as a therapist, I might have personal motives, desires and preferences. When I was studying for my counselling qualification we were drilled with the maxims of “do no harm” and “the clients’ needs are paramount” and that there in fact can be no personal gain for therapists. It is easy to understand this in the context of, say, not allowing a client to arrange to get you the best table at the restaurant they happen to work at, or free tickets to a concert through their connections. So, what about our writing together? You are right about a long-held desire coming to fruition. Not that I haven’t already written, having had three other articles published and many letters to The Age newspaper! The fact that the experience of writing our article has been so positive for both of us equally has felt like a relief. I have been thinking about how it might be for you to feel like my desire to write creates an obligation for you to meet this need. So, it seems like the arrangement is that I can meet your needs, but if you meet mine, there is an ethical problem. And yet you say that to see my excitement and investment is gratifying for you, and you don’t resent it. Not yet anyway. I wonder what might happen to make you resent it?

Harris: I can’t imagine that. I feel that we entered into this mutually – in fact, I suggested it.

Thompson: Dan, I knew you wrote for a living, and I remember when your email came through, suggesting we co-author an article about the process of arriving at the diagnosis of Borderline personality disorder (or BPD). A light inside me flicked on. Can this be something clients and therapists do together? Something about our therapeutic relationship suggested that it could work. Those many hours of therapy-built trust, and this would allow for a story to be told – not just from one perspective (be that client or therapist), but from both. We did due diligence around ethics (spoke to the editor of the PACFA journal, my supervisor and even the CEO of PACFA). Green light given. The writing allowed for a stretching, bending, flexing, and reworking of traditional client/counsellor dynamics and enhanced the work in possibly unexpected ways.

Harris: We tried writing separately, as Yalom and his client “Ginny” do in his book Everyday Gets a Little Closer (1974/1991). But eventually we returned to co-authoring in a shared Google doc that has satisfying interactivity and vibrancy. The fluidity of being able to write into the same document, and comment on each other’s and our own writing as we go, seems to form a big part of the “energy” of this new kind of shared work. (3). It also calls to mind the important work done by Wyatt et al. (4), who have offered an overview and history of collaborative writing (CW) in general, one that might be helpful to readers who are wondering how collaborative writing might be distinct from collaborative autoethnography, for example, or from narrative therapy, as we’ve discussed elsewhere in this book.

Thompson: I often think that the client-therapist relationship resists a definition that truly lands, no matter how hard we might try. An intimate partnership that grows and deepens over time, though it does not find representation in photo albums, social media posts, or at family dinners. But this relationship can be in existence one day, and not the next. When the therapy ends, chances are the client and therapist will not ever meet again. All that sharing, all that caring comes to an end when the decision is made that the work has been completed. The relationship is very contextual though; I know that people want to experience their therapist in a different way, whether that be as a person who will ultimately tell them what to do, or as someone who will help them feel differently about themselves. As a person-centred therapist, I know I resist taking on the role of the “expert.” Clients are experts of their own lives and I am there to hold the torch in a good spot so they can see more clearly what’s up ahead and choose the path.

Harris: I’m interested in what “expert” means to you. I love your ethos, but I also want to challenge you on your unwillingness to hold a position of power or expertness in the room or in this relationship. For example, when I was a teacher, I tried to do the same thing, but the students resisted it. They WANTED a parent/expert/person in charge. We were taught that it makes them feel safe. Maybe this is the same for the client in your rooms. Inviting clients into agency and power and self-determination and collaboration is one thing, but eschewing power or control altogether may be a bit disingenuous? I’m interested in what kinds of feelings it gives you to be “in charge,” and how you relate to those feelings and where they come from.

30 November 2020

Thompson: I have to respond to some pressing client issues in the next few days, so may not get back to writing till Wednesday, but I wanted to respond to this comment, as it is wonderfully provoking. I did not say I was unwilling to hold a position of power in the room, just unwilling to label myself “the expert.” I am very aware of holding power and in fact, recognise it goes with the territory. We are trained to understand this, and I think it is only in recognising it that you can be mindful of not abusing it. There are times I will be directive with clients, and even strongly suggest what should happen next. I agree that so often clients want to sink into the feeling of being held and directed by someone more powerful than them. I have also had the experience of wanting that myself as a client, from my own therapist. I am very interested in the power dynamics between client and therapist and think there is much we can write about and explore here. I note that you feel rebellious when Yalom uses his power in a paternalistic way, and it makes me wonder if that has anything to do with him inhabiting the role of “expert” to the extent that it takes the client into an infantile space. I know he doesn’t want to do that, but maybe that also goes with the territory of being a white male of his time and circumstance.

So, for me, what I reject about the expert stance is creating a vibe that puts me in a position of being “all knowing” and bestowing the answers from a superior position, creating some idea of the client having a deficit that I will “fix.” I have training, experience and skill which allows me the authority to occupy this role and do the work. I love the question around what “being in charge” means to me. I have often thought I am more comfortable with a second in charge role. I know I have leadership skills, have often been told that, and have also been in a number of leadership positions over my career. But as the youngest of four siblings (by a long shot) and older parents, I could never have been the “expert,” or “in charge” in a million years!

Thompson: You said to me that as a result of our writing the article together, you felt you trusted me more. Initially, I think I assumed that the trusting me more was about the fact that the writing went smoothly, and that nothing went wrong. Then I wondered about what it might have been like for you to read about my experiences of you as a client and to see my care in the words I offered. Not only that I wanted so much for you to be happy and fulfilled in your life, but that I saw you as vital and full of life. But now I am wondering more about the process we engaged in to produce the article. There was a spark that was ignited as we poured what was in our minds and hearts into the document. You would write something and it would create a flash of an idea in me, and then a rush of energy in trying to capture it in words. I think the same might have happened for you. There was a synergy that I don’t know we could have predicted, but maybe it was not so surprising, given the successful therapeutic space that we have created. We have been exploring the issue of the power dynamic in the client-therapist relationship. It is a strange beast because it seems like it is both needed and rebelled against simultaneously. Sometimes as a client you want me to take the reins and show you the way, and at other times you are aware that as you bare your life to me, I keep mine under wraps. You step into a vulnerable space, and I have a boundary that keeps me safe. And I want to offer sup- port and guidance but reject labels like “expert” and get cozy with terms like “fellow travellers.” Did our writing together even the score? For in that space, I saw you as the authority and looked to you to have the answers on how the work would come together. I completely trusted that you would take us to where we needed to be with this piece. Did you know that I trusted you result in you trusting me even more? 

Harris: Trish, I’m feeling the resonances of this co-authoring work with you in other places in my life. At the time of this writing, I’m also co-writing a chapter with one of my doctoral students, and co- supervisor, Julia and Elise. The chapter uses autoethnography to explore how our relationship changed during lockdown. Julia, the student, is talking about how previously she was trapped in a perfectionist student persona that didn’t allow her to share her mental health challenges, but through COVID, widespread attention to each other’s mental health in general, and us as supervisors sharing our own mental health challenges (to a degree), she has been freed to be “imperfect” and more open, thereby allowing a richer supervisory relationship. Sound familiar? In a material way, we even saw into each other’s homes through our online video sessions. A snippet, reminiscent of our conversations here:

Importantly, this turn to the personal and emotional in the context of the pandemic and consequent reduced hierarchies does not undermine Dan and Elise’s roles as supervisors, including as intellectual guides, advisors, and supporters; on the contrary, it creates a culture of care that enables Julia to further develop as a researcher by generating an ecology of empathic collaboration which fosters curiosity, connection, understandings, confidence, risk-taking, and expressivity. I love the resonances of this work we are doing as it truly does echo out into the other parts of my life. 

What Happens Underneath “What Happens”?

Thompson and Harris: Yalom and many others teach some foundational tenets: that the therapeutic relationship is a microcosm of out- side life. That whatever occurs between them, the focus and benefit must always be on the client, not the therapist. Yet Yalom also says therapists should let clients affect them, challenge them, even change them. For him, therapists must honestly and rigorously examine what it is they are bringing to this. So here we ask ourselves from both the client and therapist perspectives: Can/should we go beyond the Yalom client-centred writing, and if so, for what purpose? These questions are informed by our enquiry into the potential risks and ethical considerations identified in our creative collaboration, a challenge we have continuously held at the forefront throughout our practice together and throughout this book. Our boundaries required constant negotiation and adjustment. The foundations of our current questions in this section are underpinned by our discussions of how those risks were processed, and resolved. For example, sometimes our writing in our shared documents veered toward the therapeutic. In one case, Dan wrote about a dream they had had about Trish, and once we started to discuss it, we both realised it felt like it had crossed a line into the “therapy” space. We acknowledged it and moved back into a more shared enquiry.

Always in relation to these questions, we wonder together about the mystery of the therapeutic encounter. What hap-pens, and what happens underneath “what happens”? Common factors theory (5) suggests that the most important influence on therapeutic change is the strength of the alliance between therapist and client. Looking beyond technique and intervention (the old-school referents of mechanistic schools of psychotherapy), we instead look at what happened in the room with the two of us, and what has changed during and after the process of our collaborative experience as client and therapist.

The Power of Dialogue

 Harris: Hey Trish, what do you call a homeless horse with borderline personality disorder?

Thompson: Unstable.

We both love to laugh, and humour was there in the room but burst out even more unrestrained once we were “on the page.” It opened up new areas of exploration and trust, and helped us both relax a little as well, while we explored this new relationship. We started co-writing online during the 2020 Melbourne lockdown, while maintaining fortnightly therapy sessions, as face-to-face sessions had been prohibited by home isolation, and the humour was there from the beginning.

Thompson: Yalom (2002) talks about the therapeutic relationship between client and counsellor as being one of “fellow travellers,” So when you share your life with me, in all of its realness, I want you to experience the humanity that connects us to one another. And so, over the years, we’ve built a strong alliance, one in which talking about disorders hasn’t really figured (6). Hey Dan! How many psychotherapists does it take to change a light bulb?

Harris: Probably just one, as long as they take responsibility for their own change. This could be called having “a light bulb moment.” (3).

“We wonder together: what if we were writing a novel instead, or painting a picture? We’re writing about our therapy, not something else, so it reinforces the therapeutic relationship. We reflect on the fact that Trish is also a teacher and practice supervisor, and in those roles she encourages her students to be prepared to walk the talk, to consider the ethics of asking clients to go further than they’ll go themselves. 

We use many of the suggestions Yalom offers for calling attention to the bond between client and therapist including: doing process checks, inquiring about the state of the encounter during the session, me asking if Dan has questions for me. Through creative collaboration, the trusting here and now becomes multi-modal and multi-directional in ways that can offer new forms of corrective emotional experience.

Collaboration Extends to Co-Presenting

Harris: In May 2021, we were invited to co-present on our collaborative creative work at an art therapists conference near Melbourne, on the beautiful Morning Peninsula. We were well-prepared, drawing on our three already-published articles together, and having rehearsed. We were excited for the day. But the night before, I had this dream:

Dan’s dream:

So, we show up at Inverloch but arrive late for some reason – just before our session.

We are getting ready, and I have to go to the bathroom, and we are both fussing around and Carla is getting impatient.

All the participants are sitting at their tables, waiting for our “performance” to begin.

I take out my script but it’s not the right one – a previous draft. I ask you if you have yours and basically, we just spend a lot of time fussing around and you tell me I can read off yours, and then you say I can use your computer, etc., but all these versions of the script are wrong. Things are getting tense. The audience is impatient.

Finally, I say to you to just follow me. I start improvising, narrating that I don’t have the right script and narrating what we are going through out loud. Then I start blaming you – your script isn’t right either. Why don’t you know your script isn’t right? What are we going to do? You start laughing. I say, “don’t laugh out of nervousness, we need to do our show for these people.” It’s funnier than it sounds here.

The audience is not sure what to think. Eventually we do a series of audible asides and morph into a full blown “fight,” where we move around the room and then up to a semi-private space still in view of the participants. By now, we are arguing about the performance, and you are telling me I’m projecting and that this is the problem with doing standup with your client! The audience start to wander away, into the dining room for their meal, and we realise we need to re-engage them by asking for their help. I woke up and realised that we could perform therapist-client and that it might be funny but also instructive in a “‘show-not-tell” kind of way. I also remembered that I had done this with a student teacher in one of my first university classes. We pulled a prank where I went into class first and started complaining loudly about the teacher not being there, being late and getting the students kind of riled up, and then when Nick arrived, we were all difficult to control. He did some expert redirecting, and when it was finally calm, I would go up to the front of the room and say I was the lecturer and they always loved it.   

Thompson: I remember you telling me about this dream on the drive to Inver- loch. I thought it was hilarious and it got me imagining what we could do after we do the collaborative writing gig. We should so do stand-up comedy! I mean, how great would that be, telling insider therapy jokes and making people laugh and cry? Did I tell you that on the drive? I can’t remember if I said it or just thought it. And we had a great experience presenting to this gathering of art therapists, who were familiar and comfortable with our methods but also affirmed the radicalness of the reciprocity of our approach.

Harris: It’s challenging and at times risky work. Work that’s asked us both in different ways to re-examine the power of letting go: letting go of what we thought we were good at, who we thought we were … but the rewards are a powerful experience that is changing our self-awareness as both client and therapist.

Thompson: We have used a number of other writers in our shared work, including the meditation master and psychologist Tara Brach, and one of her favourite poets, yoga practitioner Danna Faulds. We ended our workshop with the arts therapists with the following poem by Faulds, called LET IT GO:

Harris: “Let go of the ways you thought life would unfold,
the holding of plans or dreams or expectations, let it all go.
Save your strength
to swim with the tide.  

Thompson: The choice to fight what is here before you now will only result in struggle, fear, and desperate attempts to flee from the very energy you long for.

Harris: Let go.
Let it all go and flow with the grace that washes through your days whether you received it gently or with all your quills raised to defend against invaders. 

Thompson: Take this on faith:
the mind may never find the explanations that it seeks, but you will move forward nonetheless.  

Harris: Let go,
and the wave’s crest will carry you to unknown shores, beyond your wildest dreams or destinations.

Thompson: Let it all go and find the place of rest and peace

Harris: and certain transformation.

 *** 

This material is taken from Collaborative Writing and Psychotherapy: Flattening the Hierarchy Between Therapist and Client (2024), by Trish Thompson and Daniel X. Harris, published by, and with the consent of Routledge. Buy the book with a 20% discount using code CWP23 here (discount valid from 1st December to 31st January): https://www.routledge.com/Collaborative-Writing-and-Psychotherapy-Flattening-the-Hierarchy-Between/Thompson-Harris/p/bo

Deploying Therapeutic Airbags to Enhance Clinical Outcome

“Angels can fly because they take themselves lightly.” -C.K. Chesterton

Jessica

Jessica (an amalgam) was 30 years old when she came to our clinical team. Her health was complicated and so I attended a consultation to discuss the details. This meant another meeting sitting around a round blonde table that looked like it was donated by a local elementary school. If you’ve ever worked in an institution, you know the table I’m talking about. I was told that Jessica had a brain tumor that would periodically swell with blood, and it was hypothesized that this tumor was the reason she would become aggressive. The theory was that when the tumor would expand, it placed pressure on the parts of her brain that stimulated survival reactions, and this is what led to her violent outbursts. This caught my attention. I was astounded, really. These were the early years in my practice, and this case formulation was bringing all the pieces together. It made sense of what I learned in graduate school about the fight-or-flight response, and it demonstrated the mistake of thinking that aggressive behavior was simply a result of poor character. It opened the door for compassion, and it humanized Jessica. I left the meeting with a bit of a brain buzz. It’s that feeling you get when you come across a new idea that you can chew on for a couple of days. It’s like a runner’s high, but for therapists.

Eager to meet Jessica, I walked down the hallway enjoying my high. I eventually found the right room, stepped in, and we made small talk for a bit. The discussion was off to a smooth start, and with my compelling conceptualization in hand, I decided to jump in.

“If you’re comfortable, tell me about the brain tumor. I’ve heard it plays a role in the aggressive times.”

With the appearance of deep reflection, Jessica looked down, paused, and then looked back at me. Then she gave me something to think about.

“I’m 30 years old, and somehow, I’ve got a brain tumor. Has it occurred to you over-educated and stubbornly inept shrinks that this is the reason that I’m angry?”

I felt the capillaries in my cheeks begin to swell, and I knew my skin was glowing red. It seemed there was nothing left to do, and so I just sat there, draped in embarrassment’s ridiculous costume.

Clinical Creeds

When we’re in graduate school, we learn about the maxim, “First, do no harm.” The adage comes from the ancient Greek physician Hippocrates, but we talk about what this motto might mean for a therapist. No dual relationships. No receiving large gifts. Keep your clothes on.

We learn that therapy can be dangerous in its most negligent manifestations. What makes it powerful is also what makes it dangerous. Therapy is like a flame; it can warm you or it can burn you.

While the cardinal sins seem easy enough to avoid, once we move deeper into our work, we discover how difficult it really is to do no harm. No harm? Really? Zero? Well, what about the time I was caught checking the clock only five minutes after I started the session? Or the time I made theatrical eye contact and then confidently called my client the wrong name? Masterstroke! And what about the time I immediately damaged my rapport with Jessica because it was more important that I be entertained by an interesting idea than to discover who she really was? Some amount of harm was done in each of those instances, and for the record, I’ve made much bigger mistakes.

I understand the intent behind the axiom, but I think, “First, do no harm,” is a puritanical expression. I don’t like that third word. No mistakes allowed. Be perfect. You’re only one fumble away from doing serious damage. That’s a lot of pressure, and so I’m going to try to convince you to gently set this motto aside.

Like many creeds, “do no harm” is a noble abstraction, and when we try to pull abstractions down from the ethereal world of ideas and place them into the corporeal world in which we live, we discover their limitations. We find out that what makes sense in our head doesn’t always translate into our hands. It’s like when an inspirational speaker tells you to “Carpe Diem” or “Do what you love, and the money will come.” These diet Deepak Chopra-isms seem to know more about lofty slogans than implementable methods; more about the sky than the soil.

Why does this matter? It matters because something happens when our eventual mistakes collide with this puritanical mandate to do no harm. It creates fear, and it’s a fear that lives in the heart of every therapist I’ve ever met.

Mistakes are Mentors

Fear runs deep in the heart of this profession. We fear being sued, we fear being interrogated by the regulatory board like we’re testifying before congress, and ultimately, we fear losing our careers.

But maybe this climate of fear shouldn’t surprise us. While in school, we watch video clips of awe-inspiring clinical moments. We read transcriptions of perfectly executed interventions. How many of these moments are helped along by editors? We can’t be sure. My hunch is these videos clips are often highlight reels, and the perfect dialogue transcriptions are like glossy grocery store magazines — air brushed to remove blemishes. It’s tabloid therapy.

Tabloid therapy is any presentation of the therapeutic process that’s absent of imperfection, and unfortunately, it saturates the university and post graduate training environments. But where are the blooper reels, the blunders, the awkward moments, and the misunderstandings? Where is the throat clearing, the sneezing, the spilled coffee on the shirt? I never saw myself in any of those videos or books. The unpolished learning process wasn’t role modeled, and because we’re only introduced to perfect therapy, it makes sense why we treat our blemishes like pathologies.

Problems begin to emerge when we’re too afraid of our mistakes, because this makes it difficult to learn from the valuable information held within them. When making mistakes becomes forbidden, our mistakes create fear, and then the adjustment signals are more difficult to discern. But when we relate to mistakes effectively, they signal to us where to adjust. They mentor us. This means that to grow as a therapist, the great majority of our mistakes must be taken lightly. We must sit safely with our mentors and listen for their guidance.

While I wish that all harm could be entirely avoided, I don’t see a way around it. This isn’t an invitation into clinical recklessness, but the reality is that some of our clients will experience our growing pains, while others will benefit from what we’ve learned. So go ahead, stumble over your words, double-book an appointment, botch a reflection, catch yourself zoning out, violate HIPAA, and commit insurance fraud. Okay, don’t do the last two things, but because “do no harm” interferes with the learning process, we should sweep it into the dustpan with the other noble abstractions. Carpe Diem could use the company.

First, Reduce Harm

Instead of developing an adversarial relationship with our mistakes, what if we thought about learning therapy in the same way we think about learning to drive? I didn’t want to make mistakes when I first got in a car, but despite wanting to drive perfectly, it wasn’t meant to be. The speeding tickets and fender benders were part of the learning process.

As I learned to drive, the car had safety features to reduce the risks. I did my best to drive safely, but just in case, I could rely on the airbags. What if we approached therapy this way? We don’t want to make mistakes when we’re practicing therapy, but mistakes will invariably occur. Therapy carries inherent risk, and eventually we’ll get into accidents, but what if we built strategies into therapy for damage-reduction? “First, do no harm” is unrealistic, but “First, reduce harm” might work. We could create therapeutic airbags.

The types of mistakes that can occur within therapy are limitless, and so it’s natural to wonder where we should begin with trying to reduce the risk of harm. Which mistakes should we build these airbags around? Let’s start by exploring where the accidents are the most dangerous.

Over many decades, a slow consensus began to emerge about why therapy works. Instead of believing that the correct therapeutic method was necessary for the client’s improvement, researchers noticed that there were common factors across different types of therapies that ultimately made the difference.

There were many people involved in this emerging consensus, but it was Michael Lambert who suggested that the single variable that influenced client improvement more than any other had little to do with the therapist. Instead, the client improved because of their personal qualities and environmental resources. When the client improved, about 55% of the reason had nothing to do with the therapist (1).

Up until this point, therapists were taking credit for improvements they had no part in influencing. As the saying goes, we were roosters taking credit for the sunrise. This didn’t mean that therapy wasn’t effective, but it did mean that the single most influential part of what made a person feel better was not within the therapist’s control. In hindsight, it was hubris to think we could take most of the credit for a client’s improvement.

The area where the therapist had the most influence was the quality of the therapeutic relationship. Lambert concluded that the relationship between the therapist and the client accounted for 30% of why the client improved. It mattered if empathy and warmth were characteristic of the relationship. It mattered if there was a sense of personal closeness. So, there it is. If the relationship with the client is where we can make the biggest difference, then damage to the relationship with the client is where our accidents are the most dangerous. This is where we should install the therapeutic airbags.

What does damage to the therapeutic relationship really mean? It seems to depend on who you ask. If you talk with a client-centered therapist, they’ll warn you about directing the client too much. They’ll remind you about the problems with giving advice. Directive therapy can create an aura of expertise that makes it harder for our clients to disagree with us. If it’s difficult for the client to disagree with us, they will express agreement even when they privately disagree. Then the client can’t be themselves, even with their therapist. Giving advice can lead to client hiddenness. That’s one way we can do damage to the relationship.

If you talk to a therapist that’s directive in their style, they’ll tell you about how nondirective therapy becomes aimless, and for that reason, frustrating for the client. They’ll tell you about how cognitive behavioral therapy, dialectical behavioral therapy, and acceptance and commitment therapy are each directive treatments protocols, and they work just fine. They’ll tell you about how expecting people to come up with their own answers is a form of withholding help. Clients will think you’re too removed, they’ll say. That’s another way to damage the relationship. I think they both have a point.

I once had a well-meaning directive therapist say to me, “You know when you have to tell your client that it’s time to leave their marriage?”

Nope, I really don’t. Point for non-directive therapy.

I’ve also heard something like this said multiple times, “My problem with therapy is that eventually, I need someone to tell me what they think. Some therapists just want to listen. I start to wonder if they don’t know what to do with me.”

I get that, too. Point for directive therapy.

Both directive and non-directive therapies have important critiques about each other. They’re a divorced couple that has a refined sense of the other’s shortcomings. Fortunately, the truth is that our choice is not between directive or non-directive therapy. We don’t have to pick a parent. Instead, there’s a long green field between these two positions, and how much we engage with the client should be a matter of degree. When we decide to engage with our clients more directly, we can incorporate strategies that address the concerns of the non-directive therapists, but we can proceed with our work, nonetheless.

Using Therapeutic Airbags

If we decide that we’re going to be directive to some degree with a client, then we should use a strategy that helps reduce the risk of potential harm to the therapeutic relationship. As Lambert demonstrated, the relationship that we have with our client is the single greatest factor where we have influence, and so it’s where we should be the most careful. This is where we should use the therapeutic airbags. The nondirective therapists are correct that our clients might be uncomfortable disagreeing with us, and so the purpose of a therapeutic airbag is to incentivize client disagreement. This way we can be confident that our clients aren’t overtly agreeing with us even when they privately don’t. We can work to prevent hiding, and here’s how we can do it.

Step 1: “This simply crossed my mind…”

Before we’re directive to any degree, it’s important to signal to the client how seriously we’re taking our own thoughts. If we present our impressions as authoritative theories, then the client will feel more pressure to agree with us. For many clients, it will be difficult to disagree with the theory of a professional. But if we use the opening, “This simply crossed my mind,” then we can signal something quite different. This phrase seems uninteresting on its face, but when we look closer, the words “simply” and “crossed” are doing some heavy lifting.

The word “simply” suggests that we aren’t taking ourselves too seriously. It diminishes the authority of what we think. It’s casual. There’s no grand theory about the client’s life that’s about to be introduced, because the thought just simply came to mind.

The word “crossed” also communicates our own lack of commitment to what we’re about to share. The thought passed through our mind. It came, and it went. We haven’t spent excessive amounts of time thinking about what we’re about to say. We’re signaling that we’re not personally committed to the ideas that they’re about to hear. We’re keeping things relaxed.

Step 2: “…and so tell me if this doesn’t fit.”

This is an invitation for disagreement, but it’s also more than that. Notice what word isn’t being said. We aren’t saying, “…and so tell me if this is wrong.” If we were to use the word “wrong” it would make the disagreement overt. This would make it harder for the client to disagree with us. For some people it will be hard to explicitly say to a therapist, “No, that’s wrong.”

Instead, we can use language that invites more subtle disagreement. “Tell me if this doesn’t fit,” sounds more like we’re in the changing room of a department store. Yes, there would be ethical issues with that, but you know what I mean.

Step 3: “but I found myself wondering.”

This is where we share our impressions about the client or their situation. It’s where we’re the most directive. In this step we aren’t conveying conviction, but it’s opposite — we communicate wonder.

Wonder is an essential quality in a therapist. Wonder is the combination of imagination, openness, and awe. It helps us to travel into the experience of another, and for this reason, wonder is a relative of empathy. Expressing wonder might sound like this:

“This simply crossed my mind, and so tell me if this doesn’t fit, but I found myself wondering…”

Notice the difference between, “I found myself,” and “I find myself.” The first one is past tense and the second one is present tense. When we say, “I found myself” then we are sharing a memory. When we say, “I find myself,” then we’re talking about right now. The present tense creates immediacy, and immediacy can create intensity in the conversation. There’s a place for immediacy in therapy, but this isn’t one of them. Instead, if we express what we found ourselves wondering about in a previous moment, then we can continue to keep the pressure on the client low.

Step 4: “But tell me where this misses the mark.”

This is the closing phrase. It’s useful because, “tell me where” assumes that we made a mistake. If we were to finish the skill with, “Did I miss the mark?” then for many agreeable clients, this would elicit a reassurance reaction, “No, you got it right.”

Instead, the client must correct us if they want to express agreement. Here’s how this might look:

Therapist: “But tell me where this misses that mark.”

Client: “Well, I’m not sure it does miss the mark.”

If the client wants to agree with us, then they must be disagreeable. They must jump a hurdle to correct our assumption that we made a mistake. When we set things up this way, we can have more confidence that the client is being sincere in their agreement because we’ve made the agreement harder. We’ve also made disagreement easier, because conveying the assumption that we’ve made a mistake makes it easier for the client to follow our lead.

Here’s a fictional example of the skill in its entirety. This is how things often transpire when we successfully get our client to correct us:

Therapist: “This simply crossed my mind (step 1), and so tell me if it doesn’t fit (step 2), but I found myself wondering (step 3) if part of the difficulty is that you’ve thought that setting boundaries is selfish. Setting boundaries seems to chafe against your values. But tell me where this misses the mark (step 4).”

Client: “Well, I don’t really believe that having boundaries is selfish, so I’m not sure.”

Therapist: “Okay, I gotcha. You don’t take issue with boundaries. Can you help me understand what I’m missing?”

Client: “Well, I think it’s okay to have boundaries, but I just don’t do it for some reason.”

Therapist: “I think I’m getting it now. You don’t have anything against having boundaries, but putting them into action doesn’t happen, and you’re not sure why. Tell where this missed the mark.”

In the last exchange, the therapist can return to the assumption that a mistake was made by repeating step 4 (“tell me where this missed the mark”). This way the therapist can gain confirmation from the client, or elicit a second correction.

***

This strategy is built to constantly elicit feedback from the client. It’s a feedback machine. If we use the strategy effectively, then we’ll be corrected more often. When I first started using therapeutic airbags, I thought I was getting worse at my job. The truth is that I was previously unaware of how many mistakes I was making, and this strategy was bringing my mistakes forward.

Let’s learn to view our mistakes differently. Rather than be afraid of them, we should actively work to hear about them, and then we can protect our relationship with each client. Mistakes don’t have to be blemishes, and they don’t have to be threatening. A client who talks about our mistakes is a client who feels safe enough to share them. This is not a sign of damage to the therapeutic rapport, but a sign of investment in the relationship — the client has decided not to hide. When we use these therapeutic airbags, our mistakes will come forward, and when they do, so will our clients.

Editor’s Note: This is the first in a series of five articles by David Prucha. While initially intended for beginning therapist based on his own clinical evolution, you will see that there is certainly something in each of these essays for clinicians at all levels. In the next installment of this five-part series, the author will address the challenges and benefits of working effectively with client dependence.

Reference (1) Lambert, M.J. (1992). Psychotherapy outcome research: Implications for integrative and eclectic therapists. In J.C. Norcross & M.R. Goldfried (eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp.94-129). Basic Books.

My Romance with Narrative Letters: Counter-Storying Through Letter Writing

How My Romance with Narrative Letters Began

From the second time I met with David Epston for supervision in December of 2003, learning to craft narrative letters became almost as important to me for learning to devise counter-stories as studying the verbatim transcriptions of my therapy conversations, which David had amended with his own questions. When I arrived at the door of David’s practice in Auckland on that December afternoon, he met me with these words:

“Kay, as chance would have it, Wally has just been meeting with me, and I wondered whether you would mind if he joined us for our supervision session today.”  

Before I had had time to find out who on earth Wally was or why David might consider it a good idea for him to join us, “Yes of course,” popped out of my mouth. Despite my consent, I wasn’t at all sure about the idea, especially as this was the first transcript of one of the therapy sessions I had brought to my supervision with David. I was more than a little nervous and already the paper I clutched in my hand was somewhat damp with perspiration.

As if it were not enough to be presenting my first transcript, my anxiety was heightened because I had “failed” my first supervision session a month earlier. I had made the grave assumption that our inaugural meeting would be given over to an introductory chat, preparing a supervision contract which we would sign, after which away I would run until we met for supervision properly. Surely this is how my experience told me supervision was always done? I should have known that just as David’s approach to therapy is uniquely his, so too would be his approach to supervision. At that fateful first session, when David realized that I had arrived empty-handed, he almost threw me out on my ear, but thankfully relented, settling for a firm reprimand and gifting me two more sessions in which to prove myself as a worthy supervisee. This second session had to go well, so the surprise presence of Wally was something of a curveball.

The warmth of David’s greeting slightly thawed the edges of my anxiety, and when Wally rose to greet me with his broad smile, generous handshake, and cozy, bear-like presence, I was somewhat soothed. Wally turned out to be Wally McKenzie, a veteran narrative therapist, famous for his practice in Hamilton, and for his narrative teaching on the Waikato University Masters Programme in Narrative Therapy.

“Hey, Kay,” David said as he caught sight of the pages of transcript in my slightly sweaty palms. “I can see you have brought a transcript!” David, overcome with what I soon came to know as his irrepressible and indefatigable excitement, slapped me on the back and before I knew it, he was reading the transcript aloud whilst Wally, chin in hand, listened with the ears of a seasoned therapist.

The transcript was of the second session with Wiremu and Mere, M?ori couple whose fourteen-year-old son, Edward, had found himself on the “wrong side of the tracks,” and had taken to joyriding with his mates. Rather than see his son risking the wilds of the “West Auckland hood” on his own, Wiremu had begun to join his son in his drinking and driving escapades, much to the distress of his wife.

When David had finished reading, a fevered discussion followed. Alternative questions zoomed around like silver balls on a table — first one from David, then one from Wally, rapidly followed by another from David and so it went on. Feeling that I was on something of a joyride myself, I held onto my seat and observed the narrative spectacle unfolding before me. With his usual aplomb, David then announced that he thought a letter was in order. “A letter,” I thought “What does he mean?” I soon found out. I left that day holding in my hand the gift of a two-page letter, feverishly crafted by David and Wally for this beleaguered couple and for their son, Edward.

The letter spoke of how the couple had stuck together through hard times. It acknowledged the injustices and struggles that their son had experienced, and spoke of how, despite his understandable anger, his attributes shine through in his care of his siblings and in other ways. The letter went on to invite Edward to join his parents in their commitment to put the hard times, together with mistakes they had all made, behind them. It spoke to his parents’ conviction that life could get better for them all and that they all deserved a break. It ended with an invitation to “stick together as a family,” and for their son to join them at the next session. Edward did not come with them when we next met. I began our session by reading the letter out loud to Mere and Wiremu.

Here is the beginning of my email to David written straight after my next session with Wiremu and Mere:

“When I read the letter to Wiremu and Mere, it was emotional for them both. Mere cried quietly. Wiremu began to talk about wanting his place back in the family and declared to Mere that he was no longer going to try to be a ‘mate’ to his son and instead would learn to be a father.”

And so that was how my relationship with narrative letters began, even if it might have been better described as an arranged marriage.  

Narrative letters have come to serve as extensions of sessions in my practice. Initially, they became the way in which I made up for what I judged to be mistakes in my conversations with people, or when I deemed that there was something missing from a conversation. As David once said to me with humility, “Kay, whenever I have messed up, I have always known that I could write a letter by way of apology.” While I am not immune from the need to write letters for such a reason, and I doubt if I ever will be, nowadays the purpose of my letters is almost entirely to add momentum to counter-storying. Sometimes they serve as counter-story “bombs” designed to explode the “Problem Story” between sessions.

Over the years, I have learnt how to write various types of narrative letters to serve different purposes. There are letters which act as a reminder of ideas discussed in a session; there are letters which serve to “keep the problem at bay;” letters which help to forge understandings and solidarity between the person, family members and friends; letters which recruit communities into a person’s life; letters which are written with a person to send to “a community of concern;” letters to respond to emergencies including life-saving letters; letters that I write with someone to another person or persons in their life to bring about changes in a relationship, and more. The letters that David has schooled me to write over many years have included all these intentions at times. However, despite the form of the letter, their purpose is always to give traction to an emerging counter-story. 

How My Romance with Narrative Letters Evolved

For many years (roughly between 2004-2010), I would submit draft letters to David’s “narrative eye” as regularly as I would submit transcripts. Letter writing became my way of wrestling with intransigent problems in the hopes that doing so would aid me and the people with whom I worked to find quicker and more clever ways to evade the Problem. Along with “mind maps” of possible questions, they were also my “drawing board” for my practice.

For some time, my letters would be impossibly long. I would go through reams of notes to find ideas and the germs of counter-stories themes that I wished to include. Mind-mapping of conversations would give me a picture of the story so far. The maps would lay out the different threads of possible counter-stories before me and make visible possible lines of enquiry to form the backbone of the letter. Sometimes lengthy letters were invaluable with complex problems such as anorexia/bulimia and attempted suicide, as they pulled together vital counter-story threads from sessions and juxtaposed the problem’s story and the emerging counter-story, laying each of them bare for all to see. Over the years my letters have tended to become a great deal shorter as experience has enabled me to glimpse the counter-story more keenly and resolutely. 

How I Compose Narrative Letters Today

Whenever possible, I write the letters immediately after a session. Letters written straight away have more effect because the conversation is still fresh in our minds (mine and my client’s) and in a manner of speaking, the Problem has less opportunity to displace the Counter-story. I put a limit on the time I will spend. Otherwise, I can become intoxicated with the emerging counter-story and a fifteen-minute letter can turn into a three-hour blockbuster. Rather than beginning by reading through my notes, I draft the key ideas of the letter in mind map form or by writing them down. I tend to find this easier to do on paper. Once I have a skeleton plan, I read through my notes from my sessions and circle or highlight key phrases. I then type my client’s words into the plan for the letter. As David has suggested, I aim for 40% of the letter to be in a client’s words, although sometimes this is too difficult or doesn’t ideally serve the purposes of the letter. The client’s words become the structure for the letter, arranged in a form that best “tells” the Counter-story. I then ruthlessly edit out whatever does not “move the action of the story forwards.” I then re-read and edit as I go.

Examples of Three Narrative Letters

I thought I would end with some examples of very different letters from my recent practice. The letters speak for themselves. In each letter you will see counter-stories unfolding.

This first letter is to “Leni,” a twelve-year-old girl who was referred to me through the Youth Health Hub, the community wing of the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services here in Auckland. The letter was written after the second session. This is what her parents wrote on the referral form:

“As a family, we are struggling with Leni’s anxiety issues which have worsened since starting Intermediate School. It is getting increasingly difficult to get her to school as she worries about having to go to the toilet during class time, etc. We have talked to the school, and they are trying to work around the anxiety, but Leni gets extremely anxious when her school days involve any activities outside of her normal class (sport, drama, etc.). Normally, Leni becomes emotional during these mornings and refuses to go to school. We have managed to keep her attendance quite high, but we are usually emotionally drained each morning.

The anxiety over needing to go to the toilet so often is now affecting her out-of-school activities, and she is now refusing to go to her dance classes in case she needs to go to the toilet whilst she is at the class.   

Leni has always been an anxious girl, worrying about issues she has no control over. We are looking for strategies to help manage her anxiety. The whole family is struggling because of Leni’s emotional outbursts which seem to be increasing. We feel we need to help her before her next transition to high school.”

Dear Leni

“Dear Leni,

I looked at the date before I started writing to you and realized you had been 12 for a whole week! Do you think that you are noticing being 12 at all? Even though some people might only think of 12 as just being the number after 11, are you noticing that you are a little wiser and more mature than you were this time last year? If you are, are you noticing that you are more worry-wise this year than last? If you agree that you are becoming more worry-wise, do you think it is most unlikely that as you continue to mature and grow in your wisdom that the worries will ever worry you as much as they did when you were 11 or 10, or 9 or 8?

Anyway, I said I would write to you because I thought it would be good to collect up on paper all I have learnt from you about how you have been distracting and calming down the tiger worries. Leni, would you mind letting me know when we next meet if I have got anything wrong in my letter? Can I rely on you to let me know?

I am thinking that perhaps you haven’t realized how much worry-wisdom you have now. Do you think there might be some truth in that? I ask this because when we first met, I was expecting to find that the worries had really got the better of you. Instead, I discovered that you had been using your ability to ‘pick up on stuff,’ that your Mum told me about, and had already worked out that the best way of calming the worries down was to distract them. You told me about how you worked out that distraction was your best anti-worry tactic on your own and that compared to before, you were doing ‘quite good.’

Between you and me, I had to wonder whether I would be needed at all, and I got worried I might be out of a job. I thought to myself that if you just kept distracting the worries, there was a good chance that your strategy would pay off completely. I decided to hang on in there though just in case. I’ve noticed that worries can get pretty tricky so hoped I might still be of help in a backup kind of a way. After the first time we met, you told me that you had shrunk the worries down to about twenty centimetres from thirty centimetres and then the next time you shrunk them down to ten centimetres. I have to say that this made me think even more that you had become worry-wise and it might just be a matter of time before you got the better of them completely.

That first day we met, you also told me that you had worked out that talking about the worries made them stronger, and so you had stopped telling your Mum about them.

Keeping quiet about the worries had worked so well that your Mum even wondered if they had gone! You also told me about another anti-worry tactic you had devised — you had decided to go to a different toilet at school. I didn’t ask you why you did this and now I am wondering if you decided that this would confuse the worries because they were used to you going to another toilet? Is this why you decided to do this or was there another reason?

That first day we also talked about the worries as being ‘tiger worries’ because I got to wondering about whether the worries that have been bothering you come from the same place that lots of other people have told me that the worries that bother them come from. And truth be told, the worries that bother me come from. Do you think its possible, as we talked about, that they come from that old cave girl part of you which kind of got left behind and had not grown up over the centuries like most of the other parts of us have? People say this old, cave girl, cave boy, or cave man or cave woman part is a part we needed centuries ago in case there were dangers around like tigers because it helped us to run away from them or to fight them.

Some people also say that although the tiger worries are trying to protect us, they cause trouble and instead are ‘killjoys’ because there are no real tigers. So, there is nothing to get you to run from or fight and they end up running around in circles in people’s heads instead. Do you think that the tiger worries that have bothered you are like this? Do you think they might have been frozen in time and don’t realize that there are no tigers in Te Atatu (western suburb in Auckland)? Considering you are a very caring person, I am wondering if rather than being scared of the worries as much as you were, you have started to feel a bit sorry for them because they don’t know there are no tigers in Te Atatu and don’t know what to do except run around and around?  

Do you know the phrase ‘why re-invent the wheel?’ Well, I thought to myself ‘why re-invent the wheel’ because you had already found out that distracting the tiger worries worked. Do you remember how we thought that you might have a go at distracting the worries with fun and how last time we met you told me how you and your Mum had been spending time being silly and entertaining each other (and perhaps the tiger worries too) whilst you were waiting to go to school?

Do you remember that we talked about your dog Henry when he first came to live with you, and how he was scared and cried in the kitchen the first night? Do you remember your Mum telling me about how your brother had to sleep with him to stop him crying because maybe he thought he was all alone? Do you also remember how we talked about how your whole family went with Henry to dog training to teach him how to be calm and to behave?

When we talked about Henry, I got to thinking about how it might be a bit the same for the tiger worries. You agreed that maybe they needed training, so they understood that there are no tigers in Te Atatu. We then had a bit of a problem though because the problem with these tiger worries is that you can’t see them, so how do you go about training them and calming them? We thought about you getting a little furry tiger keyring to put on your school bag to remind you to calm and train the tiger worries. We agreed that maybe you could stroke the little furry tiger on your bag when you sensed that the tiger worries might be about to come along so that you could calm them down. Do you think that this is maybe where your caring nature comes in so handy?

I am so looking forward to finding out how you have been getting on with this new anti-tiger worry tactic.

Yours in anti-tiger-worrydom,
Kay

P.S. Did I spell Henry’s name right? I don’t want to offend him or you, so please would you let me know? Thanks.” 

After the letter, Leni continued to grow her anti-worry wisdom. We had two more sessions. She is now happily settled at high school. 

Dear Jasmin

The next letter was written to “Jasmin,” a 20-year-old Egyptian, Muslim, young woman after our third session. She had also been referred by the Youth Health Hub. This is what she had written on her referral form.

“I am a 20-year-old girl who is dealing with homophobic parents. They have disowned me, and I have been living all over the country for the last year. My mood is so low that I have been in hospital four times this year and the police have been involved in helping me as well. I’m currently unsure if I should accept my parent’s support and ‘be straight,’ or live with my girlfriend… and be sad? I don’t know.”

“Dear Jasmin,

Here is your letter! We agreed I would write to you about some of what we have talked about in the hope that this gathering up of the very different strands of our conversation might help you to see them more clearly, and to support you in your attempts to ‘anchor myself inside of the two worlds I am struggling to live in.’

I have been sitting here today, reading through the notes from all our conversations, pondering the ideas, thoughts, and feelings that we have talked about and wondering what to include and what to leave out for now. Would you please let me know if you think I have not made mention of something that is important to you or if I have got anything wrong?

Jasmin, when I think of you, I think of that first day we met and how we likened your being shunned and cast out by your beloved family to being a refugee. Jasmin, would you say that for as long as you can remember you have tried to live with a foot in New Zealand and a foot in the miniature Egypt of your family home?

When you were cast out because you were in a relationship with Anna, do you ever suspect that although this casting out was more dramatic that you could ever have anticipated, that sooner or later the tensions between being ‘a Kiwi’(colloquial term for a New Zealander) and being Egyptian, would have caused a rift between you and your family as you attempted to navigate the territories of both worlds at the same time? Has your love of Anna and your parent's refusal to ‘accept me being with a woman’ intensified and perhaps hastened the tensions that might well have burst through, and perhaps forced you and your parents apart at some point or another?

As you wrestled with the heartbreak and feeling ‘so very lost,’ you also wrestled with seemingly impossible dilemmas: ‘My parents say come home, but what is home? Is it worth choosing my family over my partner or my partner over my family? If they love me, why do they not accept me?’ We talked about how perhaps your parents’ love for you and Anna’s love for you are not loves that can be compared; how your parents’ love for you is not less than Anna’s love for you and Anna’s love for you is not less than theirs.  

We discussed how every culture has blind spots which render some other ways of living so alien that they either are not seen at all or are seen very differently from the inside than from the outside. Jasmin, do you think that same-sex love is so unfamiliar to your parents as an expression of love that, in fact, it does not appear to be love to them? Do you think that perhaps your love for Anna appears only to be a threat to the life that they believe will bring you happiness? If this is true, then is their casting out of you a misguided attempt to force you to choose the only way of life that they believe will bring you and your family happiness? Is it, in fact, a very awkward and confused expression of love?

Even though these are probably not dilemmas that can be resolved, we talked at our second meeting about ‘can I find a way of living in both worlds that is not a lie?’ Do you think it is possible, Jasmin, that this question may have come to seem unanswerable to you because you have been very understandably assured that there is a true way of living? If your love for your parents and their love for you is true, and your love for Anna and her love for you is true, then could looking through the lens of a ‘one truth’ be unhelpful? Would you be interested in playing with the idea of many truths? If so, then do you think it is possible that what is said or done in one world may possibly not belie what is said or done in another world even if they seem opposed at face value? 

Jasmin, what do you think of extricating yourself from ideas of ‘truth’ and asking instead different questions? For instance, what if you were to ask yourself: ‘If my family’s love for me and my love for them is true, then is it a lie to express my love to them in a way that makes sense within that world?’ ‘In their world, can I speak my love for them “in Egyptian ways” without pretending to love in the same ways as they do?’ ‘If my love for Anna and her love for me is true, then when walking in Anna’s world, can I “speak love” as a modern, gay, Kiwi?’

Although speaking more than one language of love could be nigh impossible if these worlds collide, do you wonder whether sometime in the future, it may be possible to traverse these two worlds even if it remains hazardous and delicate? If this means agreeing to the pact that your parent’s proposed: ‘To never speak of this again,’ do you think that they and you could find some kind of unspoken understanding that, just as you will not speak of your love for women, that they will not push you towards heterosexual love? Jasmin, would you forgive me if these ideas seem impossible to you? Do they seem impossible, or do you think that there may be some virtue in considering them?

Warm regards,

Kay”

I met with Jasmin for three more sessions. She went back to work full-time, and she began to find ways to navigate ways of seeing her parents and her sister whilst remaining with her partner. Previously, her parents had refused to see her, and they had no contact for a year. When I called her recently to talk to her about publishing her letter, she was going through a tricky time after a whole year of doing very well. She is seeing a counsellor at her university. 

Recent Developments

A recent development in my letter-writing has been my “four-letter-series" for young people, an idea invented from necessity when the mental health agency, which refers to me most of the young people with whom I work, recently had their funding reduced and consequently the entitlement of sessions was reduced from a possible five to eight to a maximum of four. As a way of reconciling this, I decided to shorten the sessions to 45 minutes and spend the fifteen minutes remaining crafting short counter-story letters.   

Dear Lucy

Here is an example of a letter quartet which shows the development of the counter-story between sessions. The letters are to “Lucy,” a 14-year-old young woman. Here is what Lucy’s General Practitioner wrote on her referral from:

“Lucy presents with low mood and social anxiety worsening over the last few months. She would really benefit from some counselling.”

Again, I will let the letters speak for themselves and tell you the story of our four sessions. The letters are each written one week apart: 

Letter after Session One

"Dear Lucy,

It was a real pleasure to meet you today! Here is the letter I promised. If there is anything that you think I have misunderstood or that I have missed out, would you please let me know when we meet? Would you also mind letting me know if there is anything in this letter which particularly interests you?

Lucy, we mostly talked about ‘the glass wall’ that seems to have appeared, separating you from others and the dreadful loneliness of life behind the wall. You told me how much you would like to be able to reach through the wall, and even that you might consider ‘letting people in more.’ As we talked, it was no surprise to me to find out that you have had your trust most hurtfully broken in the past, not only by other young people but by a teacher, an adult in authority, who should have known better. I suggested to you that just maybe the reason the wall suddenly appeared in high school might have been because your body remembered how badly and shockingly hurt you were in 5th form and leapt in to protect you with the wall. If this is indeed what has happened, then do you think that your body overdid it? In its attempts to protect you, has it left you out in the cold, and you have become a little rusty in the friendship-making department? Do you think that we might be able to teach your body that, slowly but surely it can allow you to risk getting a bit closer to people again?

At the same time as you have the gift of being able to enjoy your own company, do you think that you could give yourself permission to retreat into your own world whenever you need and want to?  

As you taught me more about your experiences, it became apparent that you have learnt a great deal from these past hurts. You have learnt to speak out and to stand up to authority. Would you say that the suffering has not all been in vain because by un-suffering yourself, you have learnt to look after yourself better?

Lucy, next time we meet, how about we start to talk about what it is that you would look for in a friend and then we can start ‘testing’ people around you (even if they are only people who would be lesser friends or acquaintances), to slowly find out if they are worthy of your time, attention, and friendship?

Warm regards,

Kay”    

Letter after Session Two

“Hi Lucy,

Good to see you today. So, here is a little account of what we spoke about today and some questions that we might both like to think about.

We began our chat today by reading the letter that I wrote to you after our first session. You looked very thoughtful as you told me that you agreed that the ‘wall had come up when I went to high school because I was going through puberty, and it made me more self-conscious.’

Lucy, if self-consciousness has grown with puberty, do you think it might also be possible that you might be able to shrink it back down again as you mature more?

Do you think that the difference between now and when you were little might just be that when you were little you didn’t need to learn how to be un-self-conscious (or out-going), it just kind of happened, but now as a young person, you have to learn how to do it?

We talked a little about how you made and kept friendships before the wall went up. You told me about a whole group of friends. Melinda was the person that you felt closest to. When I asked you what it would be like if the wall isolated you from others for the rest of your life, you told me that it was if you were ‘in a bubble,’ and if you remained in the bubble you would become ‘a hermit.’ You admitted that you really don’t want this life for yourself and if you did, you wouldn’t have come for counselling. Then, you told me something I found very interesting. You likened your friendships to an egg, telling me that ‘I only need one yolk and the others are acquaintances — they are

Psychotherapists Are the Luckiest People on Earth

An almost completely neglected topic in psychotherapy is how much patients teach their therapists — not only to become better therapists, but also to become better people. Many of the best hours of my life have been spent doing psychotherapy, and many of my favorite people were the patients I did it with. Early in my career, I realized that I was a better person when doing psychotherapy than in my other relationships — much more empathic; much less selfish. Gradually, my work with patients helped smooth the rough spots in my personality, making me a better husband, father, grandfather, teacher, and friend. This piece is a small thank you for the great debt I owe my patients. I could not be more grateful and will now enumerate some of the many gifts I’ve received from my clinical work over the years.

Ten Ways Patients Make Us Better People

  1. Close Relationships: Our ability to engage in close relationships derives from inborn mammalian nature interacting with early nurture — but later life experiences play a big role in enhancing or reducing our comfort with intimacy. The essence of psychotherapy is forming a therapeutic alliance, which often turns out to be therapeutic for both partners — teaching each how to become more comfortable getting closer to people.
  2. Empathy: The ability to understand what other people feel and to see life through their eyes is also partly inborn, partly nurtured — but no profession other than psychotherapy requires and enhances it so much. Empathy muscles grow with exercise — every session is an opportunity to build and stretch our capacity to feel and express empathy.
  3. Courage Under Fire: My patients have all had much more difficult lives than my relatively easy one. And almost uniformly, they have, more or less, lived with the hand they were dealt with a courage and grit I am not sure I could have managed. I will never complain about the challenges and disappointments in my life because I have witnessed the grace shown by my patients in facing much more difficult lives.
  4. Emotional Honesty: Most people lie only rarely, but few people are emotionally honest most of the time, with themselves or others. It requires too much work and isn’t really necessary in everyday life. But psychotherapy is different — patients have to feel, think, and do things with a degree of honesty not normally required of them — and their honesty rubs off on us.
  5. Resilience: One of my patients described his life as “knocked down eight times, get up nine times.” Patients get knocked down over and over again — not only by the expectable exigencies of their external lives, but also by the internal problems that are the focus of treatment. I have been amazed and inspired by how often patients get up that ninth time — how seemingly insuperable problems and hopeless situations turn out just fine because they have the guts to keep trying and never give up hope.
  6. Good Minutes: Psychotherapy isn’t always complicated — for many patients, the goal is to maximize good minutes each day and enhance the appreciation of life’s little pleasures. This has certainly rubbed off on me.
  7. Unselfishness: A basic precept guiding the therapist’s behavior is to always put the patient’s interests first and to never be selfish or exploitative in even the most subtle ways. This also rubbed off, if to a lesser degree, in my therapy relationships.
  8. Humility: Working with patients taught me that what I don’t know about life and people is a lot, and that I often do and say dumb things. I also learned that patients could readily forgive and forget my errors of the mind but had trouble forgiving and forgetting my errors of the heart.
  9. Acceptance: Sounds corny but doing psychotherapy with patients teaches you the wisdom to know what to try to change and what to accept — in them and in yourself.
  10. Gratitude: I have had my share of failure as a psychotherapist — people who left treatment with the accurate feeling that I hadn’t helped them. But patients who did well were often very generous in their gratitude in a way that taught me to be openly grateful to them and to other people in my life.  

Magic Moments in Psychotherapy

Psychotherapists are the luckiest people on earth because our profession allows us to participate in so many deeply meaningful relationships — hour after hour, each and every workday. Certainly, this makes for a demanding career, but a richly rewarding one. And psychotherapy done well never gets routine or dull. You always have to be alert to the possibility that a “magic moment” will occur — an opportunity for you to make a big difference in your patients’ lives or for them to make a big difference in yours. Patients are not your friends but may sometimes be, in a way, closer — when you are both changed through the special intimacy of the therapeutic relationship. Our patients can be our best teachers. Mine certainly have! Questions for Thought and Discussion What are your impressions of the author’s premise? Who among your own patients/clients has taught you important lessons? Might you ever express gratitude directly to a patient for a lesson taught?